For Dog Haus, how does the franchise agreement address conflicts with existing or future laws?
Dog_Haus Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the commission of any act contrary to Applicable Law.
Whenever there is any conflict between any provisions of this Agreement and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the Parties have no legal right to contract, the latter shall prevail, but in that event, the provisions of this Agreement thus affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law.
In the event that any part, article, paragraph, sentence or clause of this Agreement shall be held to be indefinite, invalid or otherwise unenforceable, the indefinite, invalid or unenforceable provision shall be deemed deleted, and the remaining part of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 87)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Dog Haus's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement includes provisions to address potential conflicts with existing or future laws. The agreement states that nothing within it should be interpreted as requiring any action contrary to applicable law.
Specifically, if there is a conflict between any part of the agreement and any current or future statute, law, ordinance, or regulation that the parties cannot legally contract against, the law will take precedence. In such cases, the provisions of the Dog Haus franchise agreement will be limited only to the extent necessary to comply with the legal requirements.
Furthermore, if any section of the agreement is deemed indefinite, invalid, or unenforceable, that specific provision will be removed, but the remaining parts of the agreement will remain in full effect. This ensures that the entire agreement is not invalidated due to a single conflicting or unenforceable clause.