What effect do statements, questionnaires, or acknowledgements signed by a Dog Haus franchisee NOT have regarding claims under state franchise law?
Dog_Haus Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise. Any questionnaire and specific Acknowledgments shall not apply to prospective franchisees who are Maryland residents or who seek to purchase a franchise located in Maryland.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 87–328)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Dog Haus Franchise Disclosure Document, any statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed by a franchisee at the start of their franchise relationship does not waive claims under state franchise law. This includes claims related to fraud in the inducement. These documents also cannot disclaim reliance on statements made by Dog Haus, its franchise sellers, or anyone acting on their behalf. This protection is in place to ensure franchisees retain their legal rights and recourse, regardless of any documents signed during the initial franchising process. This provision overrides any conflicting terms in other franchise documents.
This means that even if a Dog Haus franchisee signs a document that appears to waive their right to sue or make claims, that waiver is not legally binding with respect to state franchise laws. The franchisee still retains the right to pursue legal action if they believe they were misled or defrauded. This is a significant protection for franchisees, as it prevents franchisors from using complex legal language or high-pressure tactics to strip franchisees of their legal rights.
However, it's important to note that for prospective Dog Haus franchisees in Maryland, any questionnaire and specific acknowledgements do not apply. This suggests that Maryland franchisees may have different or additional protections under Maryland state law. Similarly, the Michigan Addendum specifies certain provisions that are void and unenforceable if contained in any documents related to the Dog Haus franchise, further emphasizing the importance of understanding state-specific franchise laws. Therefore, prospective franchisees should consult with a legal professional to fully understand their rights and obligations in their specific state.