What claims between Dog Haus Franchisor and Franchisee must be submitted to binding arbitration?
Dog_Haus Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Each Party must submit or file any claim which would constitute a compulsory counterclaim (as defined by Rule 13 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) within the same proceedings as the claim to which it relates. Any claim which is not submitted or filed in the proceeding will be barred.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 87)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Dog Haus's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, any claim that would constitute a compulsory counterclaim must be submitted or filed within the same proceedings as the claim to which it relates. Failure to do so will result in the claim being barred.
Dog Haus may seek restraining orders or temporary or permanent injunctions in court to enforce provisions related to the use of Dog Haus Marks and confidential information, restrictive covenants, obligations upon termination or expiration of the agreement, disputes under the Lanham Act, enforcement of confidentiality rights, and acts or omissions violating applicable law that threaten the Dog Haus system or other franchisees.
The arbitrator has the authority to award relief, including money damages with interest, specific performance, injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees and costs, but cannot award exemplary or punitive damages. The arbitrator's award is binding, and each party waives the right to contest its validity or enforceability. Parties must adhere to any limitations on the time period for bringing claims. These stipulations are designed to ensure that disputes are resolved efficiently and fairly, while also protecting Dog Haus's brand and system standards.