In Minnesota, can a Cream franchisee consent to Cream obtaining injunctive relief?

According to Cream's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, if a Cream franchise is governed by Minnesota law, the franchisee cannot consent to Cream obtaining injunctive relief. However, the franchisee may seek injunctive relief. This protection is detailed under Minnesota Rule 2860.4400(J). Additionally, the document states that a court will determine if a bond is required in such cases.

This provision ensures that Cream franchisees in Minnesota retain their legal rights and are not forced to waive them as a condition of the franchise agreement. This is particularly important because it prevents Cream from leveraging its position to impose unfair terms on franchisees through mandatory consent to injunctive relief.

This type of protection is not uncommon in franchise law, as several states have regulations in place to protect franchisees from overreaching franchisor demands. Prospective Cream franchisees in Minnesota should be aware of this protection, as it can be a significant safeguard in the event of a dispute with the franchisor. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional to fully understand the implications of these regulations and how they apply to their specific situation.