In Washington, what aspects of the Crave Cookies franchise agreement might RCW 19.100.180 supersede?
Crave_Cookies Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
n 2. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any venue to a forum outside the State of Rhode another state is void with respect to a claim Investment Act. provision of the Agreement restricting jurisdiction or Island or requiring the application of the laws of otherwise enforceable under Rhode Island Franchise 3. Effective Date. This Rider is effective as of the Effective Date. Agreed to CRAVE COOKIES FRANCHISING, LLC
WASHINGTON FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT AND FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ADDENDUM
In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 47–194)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Crave Cookies's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, for franchisees in Washington state, RCW 19.100.180 may take precedence over the franchise agreement, specifically in matters of termination and renewal. This means that certain clauses within the standard Crave Cookies franchise agreement regarding how the franchise can be terminated or renewed might be superseded by Washington state law. Additionally, court decisions in Washington could also impact the enforceability of the franchise agreement concerning termination and renewal.
This addendum serves to protect franchisees by ensuring that the franchise agreement adheres to Washington's franchise laws. It emphasizes that in case of conflicting laws, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW, will govern the relationship between the franchisee and Crave Cookies. This protection extends to preventing franchisees from unintentionally waiving rights or disclaiming reliance on statements made by Crave Cookies during the franchise commencement.
For a prospective Crave Cookies franchisee in Washington, this means that the terms of termination and renewal outlined in the franchise agreement should be carefully reviewed in light of RCW 19.100.180. It would be prudent to seek legal counsel to fully understand how Washington law affects these specific aspects of the franchise agreement. This ensures that the franchisee is aware of their rights and the conditions under which the franchise can be terminated or renewed, as defined by both the agreement and the state law.