factual

In Minnesota, can a Crave Cookies franchisee consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief?

Crave_Cookies Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

The franchisee cannot consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief. The franchisor may seek injunctive relief. See Minn. Rules 2860.4400J. Also, a court will determine if a bond is required.

Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 47–194)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Crave Cookies' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee in Minnesota cannot consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief. However, Crave Cookies retains the right to seek injunctive relief against its franchisees in Minnesota. This stipulation is in accordance with Minnesota Rules 2860.4400J.

This means that while Crave Cookies can pursue legal action to prevent a franchisee from violating the franchise agreement (such as operating a competing business or misusing trademarks), the franchisee cannot sign away their right to challenge such actions in court. This provision aims to protect franchisees from potentially overreaching demands from the franchisor.

Additionally, the FDD specifies that if Crave Cookies seeks injunctive relief against a franchisee in Minnesota, the court will determine whether a bond is required. A bond serves as a financial guarantee that protects the franchisee in case the injunction is later found to be unjustified. This requirement adds another layer of protection for the franchisee, ensuring that Crave Cookies bears some financial responsibility if the injunction is improperly granted.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.