Does Minnesota consider it unfair for Crave Cookies to not protect the franchisee's right to use trademarks?

According to Crave Cookies' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Minnesota considers it unfair for Crave Cookies to not protect a franchisee's right to use trademarks. The FDD states that Crave Cookies will protect the franchisee's rights to use trademarks, service marks, trade names, logotypes, or other commercial symbols, or indemnify the franchisee from any losses, costs, or expenses arising from claims related to the use of the name. This protection aligns with Minnesota Statutes, Section 80C.12, Subd. 1(g).

This means that if a Crave Cookies franchisee in Minnesota faces any legal issues or expenses due to the use of the brand's trademarks, Crave Cookies is obligated to either protect the franchisee's right to use those trademarks or cover the associated costs. This provision offers a level of security for franchisees, ensuring they are not left to bear the financial burden of trademark-related disputes.

Prospective Crave Cookies franchisees in Minnesota should take note of this protection, as it can significantly reduce the risk associated with potential trademark infringement claims. It is advisable to carefully review the franchise agreement and related documents to fully understand the scope and limitations of this protection. Franchisees should also confirm that the franchisor has a robust system in place for managing and protecting its trademarks.