factual

In what district court was the lawsuit filed against Crave Cookies, LLC by Crumbl LLC?

Crave_Cookies Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

Crumbl LLC v. Crave Cookies, LLC, No. 2:22-cv-00319-DAO (D. Utah filed May 10, 2022). Crumbl, one of our competitors, filed suit against us. The parties in this matter filed a stipulated motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which was granted by the Court.

Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD page 10)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Crave Cookies' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Crumbl LLC filed a lawsuit against Crave Cookies, LLC. The case, identified as No. 2:22-cv-00319-DAO, was filed in the District Court of Utah. The suit was initiated on May 10, 2022. However, the parties involved later filed a stipulated motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which the Court granted, effectively ending the legal proceedings.

For a prospective franchisee, this information indicates that Crave Cookies has been involved in legal disputes with competitors, specifically Crumbl. While the lawsuit was dismissed, it highlights the potential for intellectual property or competitive conflicts within the cookie franchise market. Understanding the nature of these disputes and their resolutions can provide insight into the competitive landscape Crave Cookies operates in.

It's important to note that the FDD only discloses prior and pending actions that are required to be disclosed. Franchisees should consider asking Crave Cookies about the nature of the dispute with Crumbl and the reasons for its dismissal to gain a better understanding of the competitive risks and legal challenges that Crave Cookies might face. This information can help a franchisee assess the stability and potential risks associated with investing in a Crave Cookies franchise.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.