How does the initial franchise fee for Crave (Item 5) relate to the litigation history (Item 3)?
Crave Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
-
- Item 5 of the Disclosure Document is amended to state: "Based upon the franchisor's financial condition, the Maryland Securities Commissioner has required a financial assurance. Therefore, all initial fees and payments owed by franchisees shall be deferred until the franchisor completes its pre-opening obligations under the franchise agreement. In addition, all development fees and initial payments by area developers shall be deferred until the first franchise under the development agreement opens."
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Crave's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Item 5 details the initial franchise fees, while Item 3 outlines the brand's litigation history. In Maryland, the initial fees and payments are deferred until Crave completes its pre-opening obligations under the franchise agreement. This requirement is based on the franchisor's financial condition, as mandated by the Maryland Securities Commissioner, who requires a financial assurance. This deferral also applies to development fees and initial payments for area developers until the first franchise under the development agreement opens. This suggests that the litigation history, which includes claims of fraudulent misrepresentation and unfair trade practices, may have impacted Crave's financial stability, leading to the requirement of financial assurance in Maryland.
The litigation history in Item 3 includes cases with allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation, silent fraud, violation of Michigan's Franchise Investor Law, violation of the FTC Franchise Rule, and unfair trade practices. These lawsuits seek significant damages, including compensatory damages exceeding $75,000 in one case, punitive damages, attorneys' fees, and recission of the franchise agreements. The existence of these legal proceedings and the types of claims being made could potentially affect a prospective franchisee's decision to invest in a Crave franchise, especially if they perceive a higher risk due to the franchisor's legal challenges.
The Maryland addendum in Item 23, which amends Item 5, indicates that due to Crave's financial condition, the Maryland Securities Commissioner requires a financial assurance. This assurance leads to the deferral of all initial fees and payments from franchisees until Crave fulfills its pre-opening obligations. This measure aims to protect franchisees in Maryland, given the franchisor's financial situation, which may be influenced by the ongoing litigation. Prospective franchisees should carefully consider the implications of the litigation history and the financial assurance requirements, as they may indicate potential risks associated with investing in a Crave franchise.