In Washington, can RCW 19.100.180 supersede the Cool Binz Franchise Agreement regarding termination and renewal?
Cool_Binz Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
There may also be court decisions which may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 63–238)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Cool Binz's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, for franchisees operating in Washington state, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act (Chapter 19.100 RCW) has specific implications for the franchise agreement. Specifically, RCW 19.100.180 addresses aspects of franchise termination and renewal, and its provisions may take precedence over the terms outlined in the Cool Binz Franchise Agreement. This means that certain clauses within the franchise agreement regarding termination and renewal might not be enforceable if they conflict with the state law.
This acknowledgment is included as part of the Washington State Addenda to the Franchise Agreement, Disclosure Acknowledgment Questionnaire, and other related agreements. The FDD emphasizes that in the event of any conflict between the franchise agreement and the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, the provisions of the Act will govern the relationship between Cool Binz and the franchisee.
Prospective Cool Binz franchisees in Washington should carefully review Chapter 19.100 RCW to understand their rights and obligations regarding termination and renewal. They should also seek legal counsel to ensure full comprehension of how state law interacts with the franchise agreement. This is particularly important as court decisions may also supersede the franchise agreement in the areas of termination and renewal.