What specific differences might exist in the new City Publications franchise agreement?

disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.

• 1. In recognition of the requirements of the California Franchise Investment Law, Cal. Corp. Code §§31000-31516 and the California Franchise Relations Act, Cal. Bus. And Prof. Code §§20000-20043, the Franchise Agreement for CITY PUBLICATIONS FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. shall be amended as follows:
  • The California Franchise Relations Act provides rights to the Franchise concerning termination or nonrenewal of the Franchise Agreement, which may supersede provisions in the Franchise Agreement, specifically Sections 5.B and 19.
  • Sections 5B.10 and 20B.2 of the Franchise Agreement require Franchisee to sign a general release as a condition of renewal and transfer of the franchise; such release shall exclude claims arising under California Franchise Investment Law and California Franchise Relations Act.
  • Section 17A of the Franchise Agreement contains a covenant not to compete which extends beyond the expiration or termination of the Franchise Agreement; this covenant may not be enforceable under California law.
  • Section 18B.1.h of the Franchise Agreement which terminates the Franchise Agreement upon the bankruptcy of the Franchisee may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C. Section 101, et seq.).
  • The Franchise Agreement requires litigation to be conducted in a court located in the State of Georgia. This provision might not be enforceable for any cause of action arising under California law.
  • The Franchise Agreement requires application of the laws of the State of Georgia. This provision might not be enforceable under California law.
  • Section 19E of the Franchise Agreement contains a liquidated damages clause. Under California Civil Code Section 1671, certain liquidated damages clauses are unenforceable.
  • Section 24G of the Franchise Agreement requires binding arbitration. The arbitration will occur at the forum indicated in Section 24B with the costs being borne by the prevailing party. Prospective franchisees are encouraged to consult legal counsel to determine the applicability of California and federal laws (such as Business and Professions Code Section 20040.5, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1281, and the Federal Arbitration Act) to any provisions of the Franchise Agreement restricting venue to a forum in the State of Georgia.
  • The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation requires that the franchisor defer the collection of all initial fees from California franchisees until the franchisor has completed all its pre-opening obligations and franchisee is open for business.
  • Each provision of this Amendment shall be effective only to the extent that the jurisdictional requirements of the California Investment Law and/or the California Franchise Relations Act are met independent of this Amendment. To the extent this addendum shall be deemed to be inconsistent with any terms or conditions of said Franchise Agreement or exhibits or attachments thereto, the terms of this addendum shall govern. 3.

Section 31512.1 Franchise Agreement Provisions Void as Contrary to Public Policy:

Any provision of a franchise agreement, franchise disclosure document, acknowledgement, questionnaire, or other writing, including any exhibit thereto, disclaiming or denying any of the following shall be deemed contrary to public policy and shall be void and unenforceable:

(a) Representations made by the franchisor or its personnel or agents to a prospective franchisee;

Franchisee's Initials:

• (b) Reliance by a franchisee on any representations made by the franchisor or its personnel or agents;
• (c) Reliance by a franchisee on the franchise disclosure document, including any exhibit thereto;
• (d) Violations of any provision of this division.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned hereby acknowledges having read this Amendment, and understands and consents to be bound by all of its terms.

FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII

FOR THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA

FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND

This Amendment to the Franchise Agreement is agreed to this day of, 20, between CITY PUBLICATIONS FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. and as follows: to amend and revise said Franchise Agreement 1. In recognition of the requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, Md. Code be amended as follows: Ann., Bus. Reg. §§14-201-14-233, the Franchise Agreement for CITY PUBLICATIONS FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. shall ◼ Sections 5B.10 and 20B.2 of the Franchise Agreement require Franchisee to sign a general release as a condition of renewal and transfer of the franchise; such release shall exclude claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law. ◼ Section 18B1.h of the Franchise Agreement which terminates the Franchise Agreement upon the bankruptcy of the Franchisee may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C. Section 101, et seq.).

Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 39–129)