In Michigan, is a City Publications franchisee prevented from settling claims after entering into a Franchise Agreement?
City_Publications Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
FOR THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
-
- THE STATE OF MICHIGAN PROHIBITS CERTAIN UNFAIR PROVISIONS THAT ARE SOMETIMES IN FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS ARE IN THESE FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS, THE PROVISIONS ARE VOID AND CANNOT BE ENFORCED AGAINST YOU.
- ◼ A prohibition of the right of Franchisee to join an association of franchisees.
- ◼ A requirement that a Franchisee assent to a release, assignment, novation, waiver or estoppel which deprives a Franchisee of rights and protections provided under Michigan law. This shall not preclude a Franchisee, after entering into a Franchise Agreement, from settling any and all claims.
- ◼ A provision that permits a Franchisor to terminate a franchise prior to the expiration of this term except for good cause. Good cause shall include the failure of the Franchisee to comply with any lawful provision of the Franchise Agreement and to cure such failure after being given written notice thereof and a reasonable opportunity, which in no event need be more than 30 days, to cure such failure.
- ◼ A provision that permits a Franchisor to refuse to renew a franchise without fairly compensating the Franchisee by repurchase or other means for the fair market value at the time of expiration of the Franchisee's inventory, supplies, equipment, fixtures and furnishings. Personalized
materials which have no value to the Franchisor and inventory, supplies, equipment, fixtures and furnishings not reasonably required in the conduct of the franchise business are not subject to compensation. This subsection applies only if: (a) the term of the franchise is less than 5 years, and (b) the Franchisee is prohibited by the franchise or other agreement from continuing to conduct substantially the same business under another trademark, service mark, trade name, logotype, advertising or other commercial symbol in the same area subsequent to the expiration of the franchise or the Franchisee does not receive at least 6 months advance notice of Franchisor's intent not to renew the franchise.
- ◼ A provision that permits the Franchisor to refuse to renew a franchise on terms generally available to other Franchisees of the same class or type under similar circumstances.
This section does not require a renewal provision.
- ◼ A provision requiring that arbitration or litigation be conducted outside this state.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 39–129)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 City Publications Franchise Disclosure Document, Michigan franchisees are not prevented from settling claims after entering into a Franchise Agreement. The FDD states that any provision requiring a franchisee to assent to a release, assignment, novation, waiver, or estoppel that deprives them of rights and protections under Michigan law is void and unenforceable. However, this does not prevent a franchisee from settling claims after the Franchise Agreement has been established.
This protection ensures that City Publications franchisees in Michigan retain their legal rights and are not forced to waive them as a condition of the franchise agreement. It allows franchisees to resolve disputes or claims that may arise during the franchise term through settlement, without being restricted by potentially unfair provisions in the agreement.
This provision is specific to Michigan law, and franchisees in other states may not have the same protection. Prospective franchisees should consult with legal counsel to understand their rights and obligations under the Franchise Agreement and applicable state laws.