What rights did Evan Domanic allege Christian Brothers Automotive violated in his lawsuit?
Christian_Brothers_Automotive Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Evan Domanic v. Christian Brothers Automotive Corporation; Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00386. On or about February 7, 2022, Evan Domanic filed the above-referenced lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, alleging CBAC violated his rights under 42 U.S.C. 1981 and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by declining to extend him the opportunity to purchase a CBAC franchise. Plaintiff is seeking monetary and punitive damages of a currently undisclosed amount. CBAC has already obtained a dismissal of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims. CBAC disputes plaintiff's remaining allegations as a matter of law and fact and intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims asserted. The matter is ongoing.
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD page 14)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Christian Brothers Automotive Franchise Disclosure Document, Evan Domanic filed a lawsuit against Christian Brothers Automotive Corporation (CBAC) on February 7, 2022. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, alleges that CBAC violated Domanic's rights under two specific laws. These include 42 U.S.C. 1981, a federal statute related to equal rights under the law, and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
The core of Domanic's complaint is that Christian Brothers Automotive declined to offer him the opportunity to purchase a franchise. As a result of the alleged violations, the plaintiff is seeking monetary and punitive damages, although the exact amount is not specified in the FDD.
Christian Brothers Automotive has responded to the lawsuit by obtaining a dismissal of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims. The company disputes the remaining allegations made by Domanic and states that it intends to defend itself vigorously against these claims. The matter is currently ongoing as of the date of the FDD.