Does the Chick Fil A franchise agreement require both parties to intend to be legally bound?
Chick_Fil_A Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chick-fil-A, Inc. and the Operator intending to be legally bound, have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 103–600)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Chick Fil A Franchise Disclosure Document, the agreement explicitly states that both Chick Fil A and the operator intend to be legally bound by the terms of the agreement. This is a standard clause in franchise agreements, ensuring that both parties understand their obligations and responsibilities under the contract. This mutual intent to be legally bound is a fundamental aspect of contract law, making the agreement enforceable in court.
The inclusion of this clause reinforces the seriousness of the franchise relationship. It highlights that Chick Fil A and the operator are entering into a formal, legally recognized business arrangement. This protects both parties by providing a clear framework for their respective rights and duties.
The FDD states, "IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chick-fil-A, Inc. and the Operator intending to be legally bound, have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the day and year first above written." This statement appears directly above the signature lines for both Chick-fil-A, Inc. and the Operator, solidifying the intent of both parties to enter into a legally binding agreement.