edge_case

Regarding Chatime franchise agreements, does a delay in exercising a right constitute a waiver of that right?

Chatime Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

York.

    1. Exhibit F to the Franchise Disclosure Document (Acknowledgement Addendum to Franchise Agreement) is deleted. Franchisee and its principals are not required to complete and sign the Acknowledgement Addendum.
    1. No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.

NEW YORK AMENDMENT TO THE CHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC FRANCHISE AGREEMENT

In recognition of the requirements of the New York General Business Law, Article 33, the parties to the attached Chatime Franchise, LLC Franchise Agreement (the "Franchise Agreement") agree as follows:

  1. Section 2.6(3)(h) of the Franchise Agreement, "Option for New Term," will be amended by adding the following language at the end of the Section:

"However, to the extent required by applicable law, all rights you enjoy and any causes of action arising in your favor from the provisions of Article 33 of the General Business Law of the State of New York and the regulations issued thereunder will remain in force; it being the intent of this provision that the non-waiver provisions of General Business Law §§687.4 and 687.5 be satisfied."

  1. Clause 25.1 of the Franchise Agreement, "Choice of Law," will be amended by adding the following language at the end of the Clause:

"However, the foregoing choice of law should not be considered a waiver of any right conferred upon the Franchisor or upon the Franchisee by Article 33 of the General Business Law of the State of New York."

    1. Sections 20.1(1), (2), and (3), and 20.2(3) of the Franchise Agreement are deleted, and if applicable, Sections 18.1(1), (2) and (3), and 18.2(3) of the Multi-Unit Development Agreement are deleted.
    1. No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
    1. Each provision of this Amendment will be effective only to the extent that the jurisdictional requirements of the New York General Business Law, Article 33, §§680 through 695, and of the Codes, Rules, and Regulations of the State of New York, Title 13, Chapter VII, §§200.1 through 201.16, with respect to each such provision, are met independent of the Amendment. This Amendment will have no force or effect if such jurisdictional requirements are not met.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed, sealed, and delivered this Amendment to the Franchise Agreement on the same date as that on which the Franchise Agreement was executed.

CHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC FRANCHISEE

By: By:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:

North Dakota

NORTH DAKOTA

NORTH DAKOTA ADDENDUM TO THE CHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT

THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER HAS HELD THE FOLLOWING TO BE UNFAIR, UNJUST, OR INEQUITABLE TO NORTH DAKOTA FRANCHISEES (NORTH DAKOTA CENTURY CODE ("NDCC") §51-19-09):

  • A. Restrictive Covenants: Franchise disclosure documents that disclose the existence of covenants restricting competition contrary to NDCC §9-08-06, without further disclosing that such covenants will be subject to the statute.
  • B. Situs of Arbitration Proceedings: Franchise agreements providing that the parties must agree to the arbitration of disputes at a location that is remote from the site of the franchisee's business.
  • C. Restrictions on Forum: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to the jurisdiction of courts outside of North Dakota.
  • D. Liquidated Damages and Termination Penalties: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to liquidated damages or termination penalties.
  • E. Applicable Laws: Franchise agreements that specify that they are to be governed by the laws of a state other than North Dakota.
  • F. Waiver of Trial by Jury: Requiring North Dakota franchises to consent to the waiver of a trial by jury.
  • G. Waiver of Exemplary and Punitive Damages: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to a waiver of exemplary and punitive damage.
  • H. General Release: Franchise Agreements that require the franchisee to sign a general release upon renewal of the franchise agreement.
  • I. Limitation of Claims: Franchise agreements that require the franchisee to consent to a limitation of claims. The statute of limitations under North Dakota law applies.
  • J. Enforcement of Agreement: Franchise agreements that require the franchisee to pay all costs and expenses incurred by the franchisor in enforcing the agreement.

Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 58–262)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to the 2025 Chatime Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement contains clauses related to the waiver of rights, particularly concerning New York and Minnesota franchise laws. For franchisees in New York, the agreement is amended to ensure that rights and causes of action under Article 33 of the General Business Law are not waived. This means that even if certain provisions of the franchise agreement seem to suggest a waiver, the protections afforded by New York law remain in effect.

Specifically, the New York amendment ensures that no statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed by a franchisee can waive claims under state franchise law, including claims of fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on statements made by Chatime or its representatives. This provision overrides any conflicting terms in other documents related to the franchise agreement. Similarly, for Minnesota franchisees, the agreement is amended to ensure that the choice of law clause does not reduce any of the franchisee's rights as provided by the Minnesota Franchise Law.

These amendments suggest that Chatime acknowledges and respects state franchise laws designed to protect franchisees. The inclusion of these non-waiver provisions is a benefit to franchisees, as it prevents them from inadvertently relinquishing their legal rights through standard contract language. Prospective franchisees should carefully review these amendments and understand their rights under applicable state laws, particularly if they are operating in New York or Minnesota.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.