Is a noncompetition covenant void and unenforceable against an employee of a Chatime franchisee if their earnings are below a certain threshold?
Chatime Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
-
- A release or waiver of rights executed by a franchisee will not include rights under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rule or order thereunder except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel. Provisions such as those which unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Act, rights, or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial may not be enforceable.
-
- Transfer fees are collectable to the extent that they reflect the Franchisor'sreasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer.
-
- Pursuant to
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 58–262)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Chatime's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, specifically regarding Washington state law, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an employee of a Chatime franchisee if the employee's annualized earnings from the party seeking enforcement do not exceed $100,000 per year. This amount is subject to annual adjustments for inflation. This protection extends to employees and independent contractors, with a higher earnings threshold of $250,000 per year for independent contractors.
This provision means that Chatime franchisees in Washington cannot enforce non-compete agreements against employees who earn less than the specified amount. This limitation is designed to protect lower-income workers from being unduly restricted in their ability to seek other employment. Any conflicting provisions within the Franchise Agreement or other related documents are considered void and unenforceable in Washington.
For a prospective Chatime franchisee, this information is crucial for understanding the limitations on enforcing non-compete agreements within their workforce in Washington. They must be aware that any attempt to enforce such a covenant against an employee earning below the threshold would be legally invalid. This could impact their strategies for retaining employees and protecting their business interests in the region.
It is important to note that these regulations are specific to Washington state and may not apply in other locations where Chatime franchises operate. Franchisees should consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with all applicable state and local laws regarding non-competition agreements.