factual

What is the basis for Chatime restricting a developer's ability to compete with the franchisor?

Chatime Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

ly or contingently or hold options over shares or any other securities or units of any entity engaging in a Restrained Business; and

  • (d) procure, employ, seek to employ or engage, or appoint in any capacity (whether as a consultant, director or otherwise), any person who is or has been in the 12 months prior to such action an employee, independent contractor, or prospective franchisee of the Franchisor, its affiliates, or any Chatime Store Business.

9.3 Restraint Applies to Conduct in Any Capacity

The agreement by Franchisee Parties in clause 9.2 applies to any of them, the Interested Parties, and those acting:

  • (1) Either alone or in partnership or association with another person;
  • (2) As principal, agent, representative, director, officer, employee, or financier;
  • (3) As member, shareholder, debenture holder, note holder, or holder of any other security;
  • (4) As trustee of or as a consultant or adviser to any person; or
  • (5) In any other capacity.

9.4 Separate Restraint Agreements

Clauses 9.2 and 9.3 have effect as comprising each of the separate provisions which results from each combination of a capacity referred to in clause 9.3, a category of conduct referred to in clause 9.2, in the Restraint Area and for the Restraint Period. Each of these separate provisions operates concurrently and independently. If any separate provision is unenforceable, illegal, or void, that

provision is severed and the other separate provisions remain in force.

9.5 Directors, Managers, and Key Employees

Franchisee must ensure that any of its directors who are not a party to this Agreement, any Interested Party, manager, and any of its key employees nominated by Franchisor enter into confidentiality and non-competition agreements before they receive or are granted access to any of the Confidential Information.

9.6 Other Interested Parties

Franchisee must procure that any Interested Party specified by Franchisor enters into a noncompete and confidentiality agreement with Franchisor that contains:

  • (1) Similar reasonable restraints as imposed on Franchisee and Guarantor pursuant to clause 9.2; and
  • (2) Similar confidentiality obligations to the obligations imposed pursuant to clause 8,

as and when required by Franchisor.

9.7 Acceptable Conduct

Nothing in this clause prevents Franchisee or Guarantor from:

  • (1) Owning less than 5%, by value, of securities in a listed corporation;
  • (2) Engaging or being concerned or interested in the Franchised Business in accordance with this Agreement; or
  • (3) Engaging or being concerned or interested in any business or activity pursuant to which Franchisor has given its prior written consent.

Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 58–262)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Chatime's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the restrictions on a developer's ability to compete with Chatime are based on several clauses within the agreement. Clause 7.2 outlines specific competitive activities that are prohibited, while clause 7.3 broadens the scope of these restrictions to apply to various capacities in which the developer or related parties might act. These clauses collectively aim to prevent the developer from engaging in any business activities that could directly or indirectly compete with Chatime. Clause 7.8 states that if the developer breaches clause 7.2 or 7.3, the developer must pay Chatime all compensation, profits, monies, accruals, increments or other benefits derived or received as a result of any such breach.

These restrictions extend not only to the developer but also to their affiliates, franchisees, guarantors, and other interested parties, ensuring a comprehensive non-compete framework. Clause 7.5 requires directors, managers, and key employees to sign confidentiality and non-competition agreements. Clause 7.6 mandates that any interested party specified by Chatime must enter into a non-compete and confidentiality agreement with Chatime, reinforcing the franchisor's control over potential competitive threats. The agreements must contain a similar reasonable restraint as imposed pursuant to clause 7 and similar confidentiality obligations to the obligations imposed pursuant to clause 6, as and when required by Chatime.

Clause 7.4 clarifies that each combination of capacity, conduct, geographical area, and time period specified in the agreement constitutes a separate, independent provision. This means that if one provision is deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions still hold, strengthening the overall enforceability of the non-compete agreement. However, an exception exists as stated in section (e), which states that these restraints shall not apply to the Developer's or its affiliates' continued operation of individual Chatime Stores being operated under valid Franchise Agreement, which have not been terminated and are not in default.

For a prospective Chatime developer, these restrictions mean a significant limitation on their ability to engage in any related business ventures that could be seen as competitive. It is important to carefully review these clauses and understand the full scope of the non-compete obligations, including who is covered and what activities are restricted. Franchisees should seek legal counsel to fully understand the implications of these restrictions on their future business endeavors.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.