How can the agreement related to the Chatime franchise be amended?
Chatime Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
it F to the Franchise Disclosure Document (Acknowledgement Addendum to Franchise Agreement) is deleted. Franchisee and its principals are not required to complete and sign the Acknowledgement Addendum.
-
- No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
MARYLAND AMENDMENT TO THE CHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
In recognition of the requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, Md. Bus. Reg. Code Ann. §14-201 et seq., the parties to the attached Chatime Franchise, LLC Franchise Agreement (the "Franchise Agreement") agree as follows:
- Clauses 2.6(3)(h) and 26.2 of the Franchise Agreement, entitled "Options for New Term," and "Governing Law and Jurisdiction," will be amended by the addition of the following at the end of the clauses:
"The general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, and/or assignment/transfer shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law."
- Clause 16.3 of the Franchise Agreement is amended to add the following:
"This franchise agreement provides that disputes are resolved through arbitration. A Maryland franchise regulation states that it is an unfair or deceptive practice to require a franchisee to waive its right to file a lawsuit in Mayland claiming a violation of the Maryland Franchise Law. In light of the Federal Arbitration Act, there is some dispute as to whether this forum selection requirement is legally enforceable."
- Clause 25.12 of the Franchise Agreement, entitled "Entire Understanding," will be amended by the addition of the following at the end of the clause:
"Nothing in this Agreement or any other agreement is intended to disclaim Franchisor's representations in Franchisor's Franchise Disclosure Document."
- Clause 25.1 of the Franchise Agreement, entitled "Choice of Law," will be amended by the addition of the following at the end of the clause:
"Notwithstanding the above, Maryland franchisees are permitted to bring a lawsuit in Maryland for claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law."
-
- Clauses 20.1(1), (2), and (3), and 20.2(3) of the Franchise Agreement are deleted.
-
- No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in
connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
- Each provision of this Amendment will be effective only to the extent that the jurisdictional requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, with respect to each such provision, are met independently of the Amendment. This Amendment will have no force or effect if such jurisdictional requirements are not met.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed, sealed, and delivered this Amendment to the Franchise Agreement on the same date as that on which the Franchise Agreement was executed.
| CHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC | FRANCHISEE |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------ | ------------ |
| By: | By: |
|---|---|
| Name: | Name: |
| Title: | Title: |
MARYLAND AMENDMENT TO THE CHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC MULTI-UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
In recognition of the requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, Md. Bus. Reg. Code Ann. §14-201 et seq., the parties to the attached Chatime Franchise, LLC Multi-Unit Agreement (the "Multi-Unit Development Agreement") agree as follows:
-
- Clause 2.7(3)(h) of any Multi-Unit Development Agreement, will be amended by the addition of the following at the end of the clauses:
- "The general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, and/or assignment/transfer shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law."
-
- Clause 14.3 of the Multi-Unit Development Agreement is amended to add the following:
- "This franchise agreement provides that disputes are resolved through arbitration. A Maryland franchise regulation states that it is an unfair or deceptive practice to require a franchisee to waive its right to file a lawsuit in Mayland claiming a violation of the Maryland Franchise Law. In light of the Federal Arbitration Act, there is some dispute as to whether this forum selection requirement is legally enforceable."
-
- Clauses 18.1(1), (2) and (3), and 18.2(3) of the Multi-Unit Development Agreement are deleted.
-
- No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
-
- Each provision of this Amendment will be effective only to the extent that the jurisdictional requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, with respect to each such provision, are met independently of the Amendment. This Amendment will have no force or effect if such jurisdictional requirements are not met.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed, sealed, and delivered this Amendment to the Multi-Unit Development Agreement on the same date as that on which the Franchise Agreement was executed.
CHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC MULTI-UNIT DEVELOPER
| By: | By: |
|---|---|
| Name: | Name: |
| Title: | Title: |
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA ADDENDUM TO THECHATIME FRANCHISE, LLC FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT
In recognition of the requirements of the Minnesota Franchise Act, Minn. Stat. §§80C.01 through 80C.22, and of the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder by the Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce, Minn. Rules §§2860.0100 through 2860.9930, the Chatime Franchise, LLC Franchise Disclosure Document for use in the State of Minnesota will be amended to include the following:
- In Item 17(m), under the heading entitled "Conditions for Franchisor Approval of Transfer," will be amended by adding the following language at the end of the section:
Any general release will not apply to any liability under the Minnesota Franchise Law.
- In Items 17(b), 17(c), 17(f), and 17(k), under the headings entitled "Renewal or Extension of the Term," "Requirements for Franchisee to Renew or Extend," "Termination by Franchisor With Cause," and "'Transfer' by Franchisee – Defined," will be amended by adding the following language at the end of those sections:
Minnesota law provides you with certain termination, non-renewal, and transfer rights. In sum, Minn. Stat. §80C.14 (Subd. 3, 4, and 5) currently requires, except in certain specified cases, that you be given 90 days' notice of termination (with 60 days to cure) and 180 days' notice of nonrenewal of the Franchise Agreement, and that consent to the transfer of the franchise not be unreasonably denied.
- In Item 17(v), under the heading entitled "Choice of Forum," will be amended by adding the following language at the end of the section:
Minn. Stat. §80C.21 and Minn. Rule 2860.4400J prohibit us from requiring litigation to be conducted outside Minnesota. In addition, nothing in the Disclosure Document or Franchise Agreement can abrogate or reduce any of your rights as provided for in Minn. Stat. §80C, or your rights to any procedure, forum, or remedies provided for by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
- In Item 17(w), under the heading entitled "Choice of Law," will be amended by adding the following language at the end of the section:
This provision may not be enforceable under Minnesota law.
-
- The Franchisor will protect the Franchisee's right to use the trademarks, service marks, trade names, logotypes, or other commercial symbols or indemnify the Franchisee from any loss, costs, or expenses arising out of any claim, suit, or demand regarding the use of the name.
-
- Minn. Rules §2860.4400(D) prohibits a franchisor from requiring a franchisee to assent to a general release.
-
- Any limitations of claims must comply with Minn. Stat. §80C.17, Subd. 5.
-
- Exhibit F to the Franchise Disclosure Document (Acknowledgement Addendum to Franchise Agreement) is deleted.
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 58–262)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Chatime Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement can be amended through addenda that recognize specific state requirements. Several states, including Maryland, New York, Illinois, North Dakota, and Minnesota, have specific amendments to the standard Chatime franchise agreement to comply with their respective franchise laws. These amendments address various aspects of the franchise relationship, such as dispute resolution, franchisee rights upon termination or non-renewal, and waivers of compliance with state laws. These amendments are executed and delivered on the same date as the original franchise agreement.
For franchisees in Maryland, amendments clarify that general releases required for renewal, sale, or transfer do not apply to liabilities under Maryland franchise law. The Maryland amendment also addresses dispute resolution through arbitration and ensures that the franchisor's representations in the Franchise Disclosure Document are not disclaimed. Furthermore, Maryland franchisees retain the right to bring lawsuits in Maryland for claims arising under Maryland franchise law.
In New York, amendments ensure that franchisees retain all rights and causes of action arising from Article 33 of the General Business Law of the State of New York, preventing any waiver of rights conferred by this law. Similarly, Illinois amendments stipulate that Illinois law governs the franchise agreement and voids any provision designating jurisdiction or venue outside of Illinois, although arbitration outside of Illinois is permitted. These amendments also protect franchisees' rights upon termination and non-renewal as set forth in the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act.
For franchisees in North Dakota, amendments specify that franchisees are not required to sign a general release upon renewal and that covenants restricting competition are subject to North Dakota law, which generally considers such covenants unenforceable. The North Dakota amendment also modifies the arbitration clause, requiring the arbitration site to be agreeable to all parties and not remote from the franchisee's place of business, with the option for parties and witnesses to appear by videoconference. Additionally, it changes the clause regarding costs and expenses, detailing how the prevailing party must handle costs related to defaults, termination, and enforcement of rights under the agreement.
Minnesota law provides franchisees with certain termination, non-renewal, and transfer rights. In sum, Minn. Stat. §80C.14, Subd. 3, 4, and 5 currently requires, except specified cases, that a franchisee be given 90 days' notice of termination (with 60 days to cure) and 180 days' notice of nonrenewal of the Franchise Agreement, and that consent to the transfer of the franchise not be unreasonably withheld.