Are provisions requiring Casiola franchisees in North Dakota to consent to liquidated damages enforceable?
Casiola Franchise · 2024 FDDAnswer from 2024 FDD Document
Article 16 of the Franchise Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language: "Provisions requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to termination or liquidated damages are not enforceable in North Dakota."
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 47–209)
What This Means (2024 FDD)
According to Casiola's 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document, provisions requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to termination or liquidated damages are not enforceable in North Dakota. This protection is explicitly stated in the North Dakota Franchise Agreement Amendment. This amendment is applicable if the franchisee is a resident of North Dakota or if their Casiola business will be located within the state.
This means that Casiola franchisees in North Dakota are not required to agree to terms that would allow for termination or the payment of liquidated damages. Liquidated damages are a predetermined amount of money that a party agrees to pay if they breach a contract. This provides a significant benefit to franchisees by protecting them from potentially unfair or overly burdensome financial penalties or termination clauses.
The FDD also states that any provision requiring a franchisee to consent to termination or liquidation damages has been determined to be unfair, unjust, and inequitable within the intent of Section 51-19-09 of the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law. This reinforces the legal basis for the unenforceability of such provisions, further safeguarding the rights of Casiola franchisees in North Dakota.
Prospective franchisees should carefully review the North Dakota Addendum to the Casiola Franchise Agreement to fully understand their rights and protections under North Dakota law. They should also consult with a legal professional to ensure they are fully aware of the implications of these provisions.