What criteria determine if pending litigation against Casiola, other than routine litigation, is considered significant enough to warrant disclosure in the FDD?
Casiola Franchise · 2024 FDDAnswer from 2024 FDD Document
franchise.
-
- The department has determined that we, the franchisor, have not demonstrated we are adequately capitalized and/or that we must rely on franchise fees to fund our operations. The Commissioner has imposed a fee deferral condition, which requires that we defer the collections of all initial fees from California franchisee util we have completed all of our pre-opening obligations, and you are open for business. For California franchisees who sign a development agreement, the payment of the development and initial fees attributable to a specific unit in your development schedule is deferred until that unit is open.
Connecticut FDD Amendment
Amendments to the Casiola Franchise Disclosure Document
-
- Item 3 "Litigation," is supplemented by the addition of the following:
- A. Neither the Franchisor nor any person identified in Items 1 or 2 above has any administrative, criminal or material civil action (or a significant number of civil actions irrespective of materiality) pending against him alleging a violation of any franchise law, fraud, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, restraint of trade, unfair or deceptive practices, business opportunity law, securities law, misappropriation of property or comparable allegations.
- B. Neither the Franchisor nor any other person identified in Items 1 or 2 above has during the 10 year period immediately preceding the date of this Disclosure Document, been convicted of a felony or pleaded nolo contendere to a felony charge or been held liable in any civil action by final judgment, or been the subject of any material complaint or other legal proceeding where a felony,
Casiola. Multi-State FDD April 25, 2024
civil action, complaint or other legal proceeding involved violation of any franchise law, fraud, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, restraint of trade, unfair or deceptive practices, business opportunity law, securities law, misappropriation of property or comparable allegations or which was brought by a present or former purchaser-investor or which involves or involved the business opportunity relationship.
C.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 47–209)
What This Means (2024 FDD)
According to the 2024 Casiola Franchise Disclosure Document, the significance of pending litigation against Casiola, which warrants disclosure, is determined by the nature of the allegations. Specifically, Item 3, as amended for Connecticut, requires disclosure of administrative, criminal, or material civil actions (or a significant number of civil actions irrespective of materiality) pending against Casiola or any person identified in Items 1 or 2, if they allege violations of franchise law, fraud, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, restraint of trade, unfair or deceptive practices, business opportunity law, securities law, misappropriation of property, or comparable allegations.
Furthermore, the FDD states that disclosure is required if Casiola or any person identified in Items 1 or 2 has, within the past 10 years, been convicted of a felony, pleaded nolo contendere to a felony charge, been held liable in a civil action by final judgment, or been the subject of any material complaint or other legal proceeding involving similar violations. This also includes actions brought by present or former purchaser-investors or those involving the business opportunity relationship.
Finally, Casiola must disclose if it or any person identified in Items 1 or 2 is subject to any currently effective injunctive or restrictive order or decree relating to the franchise, or under any federal, state, or Canadian franchise, securities, business opportunity, antitrust, trade regulation, or trade practice law. This includes proceedings currently pending in which an order is sought relating to or affecting business opportunity activities or the seller-purchaser-investor relationship, or involving fraud and other specified violations.