If the termination provisions in the Carvel Franchise Agreement are inconsistent with the Federal Bankruptcy Code, which law applies?
Carvel Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
-
- If any of the provisions of the Franchise Agreement concerning termination are inconsistent with either the California Franchise Relations Act or the Federal Bankruptcy Code (concerning termination of the Agreement on certain bankruptcy-related events), then the Federal Bankruptcy Code applies.
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 100–353)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Carvel's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, if any of the termination provisions within the Franchise Agreement are inconsistent with the Federal Bankruptcy Code, then the Federal Bankruptcy Code will take precedence. This means that in situations where the Franchise Agreement's termination terms clash with the regulations outlined in the Federal Bankruptcy Code, the federal law will govern the termination process.
For a prospective Carvel franchisee, this is an important protection. Bankruptcy law is designed to provide a framework for dealing with financial distress, and this clause ensures that those protections are not undermined by the franchise agreement. This could be particularly relevant if the franchisee faces unforeseen financial difficulties and needs to consider bankruptcy as an option.
It is fairly common for franchise agreements to address the interplay between termination clauses and bankruptcy law. Franchisees should always consult with legal counsel to fully understand their rights and obligations under both the franchise agreement and applicable federal and state laws, especially concerning termination and bankruptcy.