Under the Carls franchise agreement, can a franchisee withhold royalty fees due to alleged non-performance by CJR?
Carls Franchise · 2024 FDDAnswer from 2024 FDD Document
Failure by Franchisee to have sufficient funds in the Account shall constitute a default of this Agreement. Franchisee shall not be entitled to set off, deduct or otherwise withhold any royalty fees, advertising contributions, interest charges or any other monies payable by Franchisee under this Agreement on grounds of any alleged non-performance by CJR of any of its obligations or for any other reason.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 80)
What This Means (2024 FDD)
According to the 2024 Carls Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee is not entitled to withhold royalty fees, advertising contributions, interest charges, or any other monies payable under the agreement, even if they allege non-performance by Carls. This means that regardless of any issues a franchisee may perceive with Carls fulfilling its obligations, they are still legally bound to pay all required fees in a timely manner. Failure to do so constitutes a default of the agreement.
This provision protects Carls' revenue stream and ensures consistent payments from franchisees, regardless of disputes. It is a fairly standard clause in franchise agreements, as franchisors rely on these fees to maintain their operations and provide support to the franchise system.
For a prospective Carls franchisee, this means they must have sufficient funds available to cover all fees, even if they believe Carls is not meeting its obligations. Failure to pay can lead to penalties, legal action, and potential termination of the franchise agreement. If a franchisee has concerns about Carls' performance, they should address them through proper channels, such as written complaints or legal consultation, but they cannot unilaterally withhold payments.