For Carls franchisees, what is the purpose of the addenda required by certain states?
Carls Franchise · 2024 FDDAnswer from 2024 FDD Document
RIDER TO STATE ADDENDUM TO THE CARL'S JR. RESTAURANTS FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT
FOR THE FOLLOWING STATES ONLY: CALIFORNIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW YORK, NORTH DAKOTA, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH DAKOTA, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON, WISCONSIN
The following language is hereby added to the Franchise Disclosure Document if you are a resident of one of the states listed in the heading of this Rider (the "Applicable Franchise Registration State") or a non-resident who is acquiring franchise rights permitting the location of one or more Carl's Jr. Restaurants in the Applicable Franchise Registration State:
"No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise."
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED FOR CALIFORNIA FRANCHISEES
The following information applies to franchises and franchisees subject to the California Franchise Investment Act.
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF HAWAII
THESE FRANCHISES HAVE BEEN FILED UNDER THE FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW OF THE STATE OF HAWAII. FILING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL, RECOMMENDATION OR ENDORSEMENT BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS OR A FINDING BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN IS TRUE, COMPLETE AND NOT MISLEADING.
THE FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW MAKES IT UNLAWFUL TO OFFER OR SELL ANY FRANCHISE IN THIS STATE WITHOUT FIRST PROVIDING TO THE PROSPECTIVE FRANCHISEE, OR SUBFRANCHISOR, AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION BY THE PROSPECTIVE FRANCHISEE, OF ANY BINDING FRANCHISE OR OTHER AGREEMENT, OR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PAYMENT OF ANY CONSIDERATION BY THE FRANCHISEE, OR SUBFRANCHISOR, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST, A COPY OF THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH A COPY OF ALL PROPOSED AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF THE FRANCHISE.
THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT CONTAINS A SUMMARY ONLY OF CERTAIN MATERIAL PROVISIONS OF THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT SHOULD BE REFERRED TO FOR A STATEMENT OF ALL RIGHTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF BOTH THE FRANCHISOR AND THE FRANCHISEE.
Registered agent in the state authorized to receive service of process: Commissioner of Securities, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Business Registration Division, Securities Compliance Branch, 335 Merchant Street, Room 203, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
ADDENDUM TO THE CARL'S JR. RESTAURANT FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT REQUIRED FOR MINNESOTA FRANCHISEES
The following information applies to franchises and franchisees subject to Minnesota statutes and regulations.
-
- Minnesota Statutes, Section 80C.21 and Minnesota Rules 2860.4400(J) prohibit the franchisor from requiring litigation to be conducted outside Minnesota, requiring waiver of a jury trial, or requiring the franchisee to consent to liquidated damages, termination penalties or judgment notes. In addition, nothing in the Franchise Disclosure Document or agreement(s) can abrogate or reduce (1) any of the franchisee's rights as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 80C or (2) franchisee's rights to any procedure, forum, or remedies provided for by the laws of the jurisdiction.
-
- With respect to franchises governed by Minnesota law, the franchisor will comply with Minnesota Statutes, Section 80C.14, Subd. 3-5, which require (except in certain specified cases) (1) that a franchisee be given 90 days notice of termination (with 60 days to cure) and 180 days notice for non- renewal of the franchise agreement and (2) that consent to the transfer of the franchise will not be unreasonably withheld.
-
- The franchisor will protect the franchisee's rights to use the trademarks, service marks, trade names, logotypes or other commercial symbols or indemnify the franchisee from any loss, costs or expenses arising out of any claim, suit or demand regarding the use of the name.
-
- Minnesota considers it unfair to not protect the franchisee's right to use the trademarks. Refer to Minnesota Statues, Section 80C.12, Subd. 1(g).
-
- Minnesota Rules 2860.4400(D) prohibits a franchisor from requiring a franchisee to assent to a general release.
-
- The franchisee cannot consent to the franchisor obtaining injunctive relief. The franchisor may seek injunctive relief. See Minn. Rules 2860.4400J. Also, a court will determine if a bond is required.
-
- The Limitations of Claims section must comply with Minnesota Statutes, Section 80C.17, Subd. 5. If the Franchise Agreement contains a limitations period for bringing claims against Franchisor which is shorter than the limitations period provided under the Minnesota Act, the Franchise Agreement shall be modified to conform to the Minnesota Act.
ADDENDUM TO THE CARL'S JR. RESTAURANT FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT REQUIRED FOR WASHINGTON FRANCHISEES
In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchi
- 1. The provisions of this Addendum form an integral part of, and are incorporated into, the Franchise Agreement. This Addendum is being executed because: (A) the offer or sale of a franchise to Franchisee was made in the State of Wisconsin; (B) Franchisee is a resident of the State of Wisconsin; and/or (C) the Franchised Restaurant will be located or operated in the State of Wisconsin.
- 2. The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, Chapter 135, Stats., supersedes any provision of the Franchise Agreement inconsistent with that law.
- 3. The following paragraph is added to the end of Sections 2.B. and 18:
Section 135.04 of the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law includes the requirement that, in certain circumstances, a franchisee receive 90 days' notice of termination, cancellation, non-renewal or substantial change in competitive circumstances. The notice shall state all the reasons for termination, cancellation, non-renewal or substantial change in competitive circumstances and shall provide that the franchisee has 60 days in which to rectify any claimed deficiency and shall supersede the requirements of paragraph 18 of the Franchise Agreement to the extent they may be inconsistent with the Law's requirements. If the deficiency is rectified within 60 days the notice shall be void. The above-notice provisions shall not apply if the reason for termination, cancellation or nonrenewal is insolvency, the occurrence of an assignment for the benefit of creditors or bankruptcy. If the reason for termination, cancellation, nonrenewal or substantial change in competitive circumstances is nonpayment of sums due under the Franchise Agreement, Franchisee shall be entitled to written notice of such default, and shall have 10 days in which to remedy such default from the date of delivery or posting of such notice.
- 4. Any capitalized terms that are not defined in this Addendum shall have the meaning given them in the Franchise Agreement.
- 5. The provisions of this Addendum will be effective only to the extent that the jurisdictional requirements of the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law are met independently of this Addendum.
- 6. Except as expressly modified by this Addendum, the Franchise Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 80–480)
What This Means (2024 FDD)
According to the 2024 Carls FDD, the addenda required by certain states serve to protect franchisees by ensuring compliance with state-specific franchise laws and regulations. These addenda, which are integrated into the franchise agreement, address various aspects such as franchisee rights, termination and renewal conditions, and dispute resolution processes. The specific provisions within the addenda are triggered when the franchise offer or sale occurs in a particular state, the franchisee resides in that state, or the franchised restaurant operates within that state.
For instance, the addendum for franchisees in California and Hawaii includes disclosures required by those states' franchise investment laws. The Minnesota addendum ensures that Carls complies with Minnesota Statutes regarding termination notices, non-renewal terms, and protection of trademark usage. It also prevents Carls from requiring litigation to occur outside of Minnesota or from enforcing waivers of jury trials or certain damages. Similarly, the Washington addendum incorporates the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, which may supersede the standard franchise agreement, particularly in areas of termination and renewal.
These addenda modify the franchise agreement to align with state laws, providing franchisees with additional rights and protections beyond those in the standard agreement. For example, franchisees in Wisconsin receive specific notice and cure periods for termination, cancellation, or non-renewal, as mandated by the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law. These state-specific addenda are crucial for prospective Carls franchisees to understand, as they can significantly impact their rights and obligations depending on the state in which they operate.
Overall, the state addenda in the Carls franchise agreement are designed to create a legally compliant and fair franchising relationship, tailored to the specific regulatory environment of each state. Prospective franchisees should carefully review the addendum applicable to their state to fully understand their rights and obligations under the franchise agreement.