In the event of conflicting laws, which law prevails for a Caring Transitions franchise?
Caring_Transitions Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
-
- Franchisee Bill of Rights.
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
There may also be court decisions that supersede the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor.
Franchise agreement provisions, including those summarized in Item 17 of the Franchise Disclosure Document, are subject to state law.
-
- Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation.
In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation.
In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement, a franchisee may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of franchises, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
-
- General Release.
A release or waiver of rights in the franchise agreement or related agreements purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rules or orders thereunder is void except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel, in accordance with RCW 19.100.220(2).
In addition, any such release or waiver executed in connection with a renewal or transfer of a franchise is likewise void except as provided for in RCW 19.100.220(2).
-
- Statute of Limitations and Waiver of Jury Trial.
Provisions contained in the franchise agreement or related agreements that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 49)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Caring Transitions' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, in the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW, will prevail. This means that if there is a disagreement or inconsistency between different legal rules, the specific laws in the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act will be the ones that are followed and enforced.
This is particularly important for franchisees operating in Washington or those who may have legal disputes governed by Washington law. The Franchisee Bill of Rights, RCW 19.100.180, may also take precedence over certain provisions in the franchise agreement, especially concerning termination and renewal. Court decisions can also supersede the franchise agreement, meaning that rulings made by courts can change or override what is written in the franchise agreement.
Furthermore, any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington must occur in Washington, unless otherwise agreed upon. Franchisees also have the right to bring legal action in Washington for issues related to the sale of franchises or violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, if litigation is not precluded by the franchise agreement. This ensures that franchisees have a local venue for resolving disputes and protecting their rights under Washington law.
Releases or waivers of rights under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act are void unless they meet specific conditions, such as being part of a negotiated settlement with independent legal representation. Provisions that unreasonably restrict the statute of limitations for claims or rights under the Act, like the right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable. These protections ensure that franchisees are not unfairly disadvantaged or coerced into giving up their legal rights.