Does the Canine Dimensions franchise agreement specify any exceptions to the requirement of complying with all applicable laws?
Canine_Dimensions Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
RANCHISEE: | | Witness | |
ADDENDUM TO CANINE DIMENSIONS FRANCHISING, LLC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT FOR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
Despite anything to the contrary in the Franchise Agreement, the following provisions will supersede and apply to all franchises offered and sold in the State of Minnesota:
-
- Any provision in the Franchise Agreement that would require you to assent to a release, assignment, novation or waiver that would relieve any person from liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 80C.01 to 80C.22 will be void to the extent that such contractual provision violates such law.
-
- Minnesota Statute Section 80C.21 and Minnesota Rule 2860.4400J prohibit the franchisor from requiring litigation to be conducted outside of Minnesota. In addition, nothing in the Franchise Disclosure Document or Agreement can abrogate or reduce any of your rights as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 80C, or your rights to any procedure, forum, or remedies provided for by the laws of Minnesota.
-
- Minn. Rule Part 2860.4400J. prohibits a franchisee from waiving his rights to a jury trial or waiving his rights to any procedure, forum, or remedies provided for by the laws of the jurisdiction, or consenting to liquidated damages, termination penalties or judgment notes. Any provision in the Agreement which would require you to waive your rights to any procedure, forum or remedies provided for by the laws of the State of Minnesota is deleted from any Agreement relating to franchises offered and sold in the State of Minnesota; provided, however, that this paragraph will not affect the obligation in the Agreement relating to arbitration.
-
- With respect to franchises governed by Minnesota law, we will comply with Minnesota Statute Section 80C.14, Subds. 3, 4 and 5, which require, except in certain specified cases, that you be given 90 days notice of termination (with 60 days to cure) and 180 days notice for non-renewal of the Agreement; and that consent to the transfer of the franchise will not be unreasonably withheld.
-
- Item 13 of the FDD is hereby amended to state that we will protect your rights under this Agreement to use the Marks, or indemnify you from any loss, costs, or expenses arising out of any third-party claim, suit or demand regarding your use of the Marks, if your use of the Marks is in compliance with the provisions of the Agreement and Our System standards. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Franchise Agreement, we will protect your rights under this Agreement to use the Marks, or indemnify you from any loss, costs, or expenses arising out of any third-party claim, suit or demand regarding your use of the Marks, if your use of the Marks is in compliance with the provisions of the Franchise Agreement and our System standards.
-
- Minnesota Rule 2860.4400(D) prohibits a franchisor from requiring a franchisee to assent to a general release. As a result, the sections of the Franchise Agreement that require you to sign a general release prior to renewing or transferring your franchise are hereby deleted from the Franchise Agreement.
-
- The following language will be added to the Franchise Agreement:
No Abrogation. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 80C.21, nothing in this Agreement will in any way abrogate or reduce any of your rights as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 80.C.
4898-4112-2359, v. 1 8. Minnesota Statute Section 80C.17 states that no action for a violation of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 80C.01 to 80C.22 may be commenced more than three years after the cause of action accrues. To
the extent that the Franchise Agreement conflicts with Minnesota law, Minnesota law will prevail.
No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
| IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed, sealed and delivered this | |
|---|---|
| Addendum dated this day of, 20 | |
| ATTEST CANINE DIMENSIONS FRANCHISING, LLC | By: |
| Witness Name: | Title: FRANCHISEE: |
| Witness |
ADDENDUM TO CANINE DIMENSIONS FRANCHISING, LLC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK
- The following information is added to the cover page of the Franchise Disclosure Document:
INFORMATION COMPARING FRANCHISORS IS AVAILABLE. CALL THE STATE ADMINISTRATORS LISTED IN EXHIBIT A OR YOUR PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR SERVICES OR INFORMATION. REGISTRATION OF THIS FRANCHISE BY NEW YORK STATE DOES NOT MEAN THAT NEW YORK STATE RECOMMENDS IT OR HAS VERIFIED THE INFORMATION IN THIS FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 36)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Canine Dimensions' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement generally requires franchisees to operate their businesses in full compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations. However, there are state-specific addenda that create exceptions or clarifications to this requirement in certain jurisdictions.
For franchisees in Minnesota, several provisions of the franchise agreement are superseded by Minnesota law. These include stipulations that would require the franchisee to waive rights or relieve any person from liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, restrictions on conducting litigation outside of Minnesota, and waivers of rights to a jury trial or other legal procedures. The addendum ensures that the franchisee's rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 80C, are not diminished.
Similarly, for franchisees in California, the addendum states that if the Franchise Agreement contains provisions inconsistent with California Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043, the law will control. It also addresses issues such as termination upon bankruptcy, covenants not to compete, and the requirement to provide a disclosure document before material modifications to the franchise. Furthermore, the addendum notes that the application of Florida law, as required by the franchise agreement, may not be enforceable under California law. For franchisees in Virginia and Illinois, state laws also take precedence over certain aspects of the franchise agreement to protect franchisee rights and ensure compliance with local regulations.