factual

Did Camp Margaritaville admit any liability for the claims in the Boss Investments Ltd. case?

Camp_Margaritaville Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

This matter was settled pursuant to the Amended Confidential Mediated Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") and Third Amendment to Trademark Sub-License Agreement, dated as of December 30, 2020. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice as of January 8, 2021. Without admitting any liability for the claims, under the Settlement Agreement, the corporate defendants agreed to pay to Boss 50 percent of future royalties from food and beverage, and certain merchandise, from the Bahamian Hotel. As part of the Settlement Agreement, prior restrictions under the Boss Agreement in the Bahamas were released except for certain restrictions in Paradise Island and Nassau.

Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 16–18)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Camp Margaritaville's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the litigation with Boss Investments Ltd. was settled through an Amended Confidential Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Third Amendment to the Trademark Sub-License Agreement, both dated December 30, 2020. The case was then voluntarily dismissed with prejudice on January 8, 2021.

Importantly, the FDD states that the corporate defendants, which include Margaritaville of Bahamas, LLC, Margaritaville Enterprises, LLC, and Margaritaville Holdings LLC, did not admit any liability for the claims made by Boss Investments Ltd. However, as part of the settlement, these corporate defendants agreed to pay Boss Investments Ltd. 50 percent of future royalties from food and beverage, and certain merchandise, originating from the Bahamian Hotel. The settlement also released prior restrictions under the Boss Agreement in the Bahamas, with the exception of certain restrictions in Paradise Island and Nassau.

This settlement agreement indicates that while Camp Margaritaville (through its related corporate entities) did not admit fault, they did agree to a financial arrangement involving a percentage of future royalties. This type of settlement is common in trademark disputes, where companies may choose to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainties of litigation, even if they believe they have a strong defense. Prospective franchisees should be aware of these types of legal entanglements, as they can impact the financial performance and brand reputation of Camp Margaritaville.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.