In the Connecticut arbitration case, what is the name of the former Byrider franchisee's company?
Byrider Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
H. Jeffrey Baker, et al. v. Byrider Franchising, LLC, et al., JAMS Arbitration, Boston Division, Case No: 14000. On July 21, 2017, the former franchisees of a Byrider
dealership in Branford, Connecticut, CT102 LLC and Sixela LLC, and personal guarantor of those entities' franchise agreement, H.
Jeffrey Baker, initiated an arbitration demand against Byrider Franchising, J.D.
Byrider Systems, LLC, Byrider Holding Corp., Brad M.
Malott, Michael K.
Source: Item 3 — Litigation (FDD pages 15–19)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Byrider's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the former franchisees of a Byrider dealership in Branford, Connecticut, involved in an arbitration case, operated under the names CT102 LLC and Sixela LLC. H. Jeffrey Baker was the personal guarantor of the franchise agreement for these entities.
The arbitration demand, initiated on July 21, 2017, was filed against Byrider Franchising and related entities. The case, identified as JAMS Arbitration, Boston Division, Case No: 14000, indicates that CT102 LLC and Sixela LLC were the legal entities through which the Byrider franchise in Branford, Connecticut was operated.
This information is relevant for prospective franchisees as it highlights potential legal disputes and the importance of understanding the obligations and liabilities associated with the franchise agreement, including the role of personal guarantors and the entities through which the franchise operates. Franchisees should carefully review the litigation history and understand the legal framework under which they are operating their Byrider franchise.