What is the case number for the JAMS arbitration involving Byrider and the former Connecticut franchisees?
Byrider Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
H. Jeffrey Baker, et al. v. Byrider Franchising, LLC, et al., JAMS Arbitration, Boston Division, Case No: 14000. On July 21, 2017, the former franchisees of a Byrider
dealership in Branford, Connecticut, CT102 LLC and Sixela LLC, and personal guarantor of those entities' franchise agreement, H.
Jeffrey Baker, initiated an arbitration demand against Byrider Franchising, J.D.
Byrider Systems, LLC, Byrider Holding Corp., Brad M.
Malott, Michael K.
Source: Item 3 — Litigation (FDD pages 15–19)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Byrider's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the case number for the JAMS arbitration involving Byrider and the former Connecticut franchisees is Case No: 14000. The former franchisees of a Byrider dealership in Branford, Connecticut, CT102 LLC and Sixela LLC, and personal guarantor H. Jeffrey Baker, initiated an arbitration demand against Byrider Franchising, J.D. Byrider Systems, LLC, Byrider Holding Corp., Brad M. Malott, and Michael K.
This legal action was initiated on July 21, 2017, indicating that the dispute has been ongoing for several years. It's important to note that this arbitration was handled by the Boston Division of JAMS (Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services).
Prospective franchisees should be aware of Byrider's history of legal disputes with its franchisees. Understanding the nature and outcomes of these disputes, such as the Connecticut case, can provide valuable insights into the potential challenges and risks associated with investing in a Byrider franchise. Reviewing the details of these cases can help potential franchisees assess their own risk tolerance and prepare for potential conflicts.
It is also important to note that this case was settled. Effective May 1, 2018, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement under which Byrider Franchising, J.D. Byrider Systems, LLC, and Byrider Holding Corp. agreed to pay claimants $500,000 to fully settle all claims and counterclaims against all parties. Claimants received the full settlement amount and all claims and counterclaims were dismissed with prejudice.