exception

Under what conditions is Burger King prohibited from requiring a franchisee to assent to a release, assignment, novation, or waiver according to Minnesota Statutes?

Burger_King Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

    1. BKC shall not require Franchisee to assent to a release, assignment, novation or waiver that would relieve any person from liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 80C.01 to 80C.22, provided that the foregoing shall not bar the voluntary settlement of disputes.

Source: Item 20 — OUTLETS AND FRANCHISEE INFORMATION (FDD pages 109–124)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Burger King's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, several amendments address stipulations for franchises offered and sold in Minnesota. Specifically, Burger King cannot require a franchisee or developer to agree to a release, assignment, novation, or waiver that would relieve any person from liability as imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 80C.01 to 80C.22. This protection is in place to ensure that franchisees and developers retain their rights and remedies under Minnesota law. However, this does not prevent the voluntary settlement of disputes. This condition applies to Burger King Restaurant Franchise Agreements (for both entity and individual/owner-operator agreements), Development Agreements, Multiple Target Reservation Agreements, and Target Reservation Agreements within the state of Minnesota.

This provision is crucial for prospective Burger King franchisees in Minnesota as it safeguards their legal rights and ensures that they cannot be forced to relinquish their ability to pursue legal remedies under the Minnesota Franchise Act. The inclusion of this clause in various agreements (Franchise, Development, and Reservation) indicates that the protection extends across different stages of the franchise relationship, from initial development to ongoing operation.

The FDD also mentions that Minnesota Statutes, Section 80C.21 and Minnesota Rule 2860.4400(J) further protect franchisees by prohibiting Burger King from requiring litigation to be conducted outside Minnesota, requiring waiver of a jury trial, or requiring franchisees to consent to liquidated damages, termination penalties, or judgment notes. These additional protections reinforce the franchisee's rights to a fair legal process and prevent the franchisor from imposing onerous financial penalties or legal burdens.

It is important for prospective Burger King franchisees in Minnesota to carefully review these amendments and understand their rights under Minnesota law. Consulting with a franchise attorney is advisable to fully comprehend the implications of these provisions and ensure that their interests are adequately protected throughout the franchise relationship.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.