What Washington statute, RCW 19.100.180, may supersede the Buns On Fire Franchise Agreement?
Buns_On_Fire Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
The state of Washington has a statute, RCW 19.100.180, which may supersede the license agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the license agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your license.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 49–200)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Buns On Fire Franchise Disclosure Document, for franchisees operating in Washington state, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, specifically RCW 19.100.180, may supersede the franchise agreement. This means that certain provisions of the Buns On Fire franchise agreement, particularly those related to termination and renewal, might not be enforceable if they conflict with the state statute. Court decisions may also supersede the license agreement in areas of termination and renewal.
This addendum to Item 17 of the Buns On Fire FDD clarifies that Washington state law takes precedence over the standard franchise agreement in certain areas. It also stipulates that for any arbitration involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration site should be in Washington, or a location mutually agreed upon, or determined by the arbitrator.
This is a crucial consideration for prospective Buns On Fire franchisees in Washington. It ensures that franchisees are protected by state laws designed to prevent franchisor overreach. Franchisees should consult with legal counsel to fully understand their rights and obligations under both the franchise agreement and Washington state law.