On what date did the court grant the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against Brueggers Bagels?
Brueggers_Bagels Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Colorado Bagel Company, LLC v. Bruegger's Franchise Corporation, Case No. 2024CV33517 (D.Ct. Denver, CO). The plaintiff in this case, a Bruegger's franchisee, filed this lawsuit on November 14, 2024. The case involves the franchisee's operation of its franchised store after the expiration of the franchise agreement, and follows our termination of the at-will relationship. The plaintiff's complaint includes claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, declaratory relief and injunctive relief, and seeks damages in an unspecified amount, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, costs, and interest. We answered the complaint, denying the material allegations, and asserted counterclaims against the plaintiff and its members. On November 21, 2024, the court granted the plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order, prohibiting us from effecting the termination. On December 22, 2024, the court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, prohibiting us from effecting the termination. The case is currently in the discovery phase.
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD page 12)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Brueggers Bagels Franchise Disclosure Document, a franchisee filed a lawsuit against Brueggers Franchise Corporation on November 14, 2024. The franchisee's complaint included claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, declaratory relief and injunctive relief. The franchisee sought damages, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, costs, and interest. Brueggers Bagels answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims against the plaintiff and its members.
The court granted the plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order on November 21, 2024, which prohibited Brueggers Bagels from effecting the termination of the franchise agreement. Subsequently, on December 22, 2024, the court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, further prohibiting Brueggers Bagels from terminating the agreement.
This information is relevant to potential franchisees as it highlights a legal dispute between Brueggers Bagels and one of its franchisees. It is important to note that litigation can be costly and time-consuming, and the outcome is inherently uncertain. The fact that the court granted both a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction suggests that the franchisee had a reasonable chance of success on the merits of their claims. Prospective franchisees should consider this information when evaluating the risks and benefits of investing in a Brueggers Bagels franchise.