If there is a conflict of laws, which law prevails for a Body20 franchise in Washington?

According to the 2025 Body20 Franchise Disclosure Document, specifically Item 23, if there is a conflict of laws concerning a Body20 franchise in Washington, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW, will take precedence. This means that any disputes or legal issues arising in Washington will be governed by Washington state law, regardless of what the franchise agreement might otherwise state.

This protection extends to the franchisee's rights, as RCW 19.100.180 may override specific terms in the franchise agreement regarding the relationship between the franchisee and Body20, particularly in areas like termination and renewal. Additionally, Washington state law dictates that any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington must occur within the state, unless both parties agree to an alternative location or the arbitrator/mediator determines otherwise. Franchisees also have the right to bring legal action in Washington for issues related to the sale of franchises or violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, provided litigation isn't precluded by the franchise agreement.

Furthermore, any attempts to waive compliance with the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act within the franchise agreement are void, unless the waiver is part of a negotiated settlement with independent legal representation after the agreement is already in effect, as per RCW 19.100.220(2). This protection also applies to waivers related to franchise renewals or transfers, ensuring that franchisees cannot unknowingly relinquish their rights under state law. Provisions that unreasonably restrict the statute of limitations for claims or rights under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, such as the right to a jury trial, may also be deemed unenforceable.

These stipulations collectively reinforce the importance of franchisees understanding their rights under Washington state law and highlight the protections afforded to them, ensuring that the franchise agreement does not supersede the legal safeguards in place to protect their investment and business operations.