If litigation is not precluded by the Body20 franchise agreement, can a franchisee bring an action in Washington for a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act?

According to Body20's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, if the franchise agreement does not preclude litigation, a franchisee can bring an action in Washington if it arises from the sale of franchises or involves a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act. This means that Body20 franchisees in Washington have the right to sue Body20 for violations of Washington's franchise laws, provided the franchise agreement does not contain language that prohibits such lawsuits.

This provision is significant because it protects the rights of Body20 franchisees in Washington and ensures that they can seek legal recourse if they believe Body20 has violated the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act. The FDD also states that provisions in the franchise agreement that unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.

This protection is further reinforced by the statement that any release or waiver of rights that attempts to waive compliance with the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act is void unless it meets specific conditions, such as being part of a negotiated settlement with independent legal representation. This prevents Body20 from using the franchise agreement to force franchisees to give up their rights under Washington law.

Prospective Body20 franchisees in Washington should carefully review the franchise agreement to understand their rights and obligations under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act. They should also consult with an attorney to ensure that they fully understand the implications of the franchise agreement and their legal options in case of a dispute with Body20.