In California, if the Body20 Development Agreement or Franchise Agreement contains a provision inconsistent with the law regarding franchisee rights concerning termination or nonrenewal, which will control?

According to Body20's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, California Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043 provide rights to Body20 franchisees and multi-unit developers concerning the termination or nonrenewal of a franchise. Therefore, if any provision in the Development Agreement or Franchise Agreement is inconsistent with this law, California law will take precedence and control the matter, assuming the law applies.

This means that Body20 franchisees in California have specific legal protections regarding the termination or non-renewal of their franchise agreements. If the franchise agreement attempts to override these protections, those specific provisions may be unenforceable under California law. This is a significant benefit for franchisees, as it ensures that their rights are protected and that Body20 cannot unfairly terminate or refuse to renew their agreements.

Prospective Body20 franchisees in California should carefully review the Development Agreement and Franchise Agreement with legal counsel to identify any potential conflicts with California law. This will help them understand their rights and ensure that they are not signing away any legal protections. It is also important to be aware that certain other provisions in the agreements, such as those related to non-compete clauses, termination upon bankruptcy, and the application of Delaware law, might not be enforceable under California law.