In the event of conflicting laws, which law prevails for Bigfoot Forestry franchises?
Bigfoot_Forestry Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
If applicable Law imposes mandatory terms that conflict with this Agreement, the terms required by such Law shall govern to the extent of the inconsistency.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPT (FDD pages 42–162)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Bigfoot Forestry Franchise Disclosure Document, if there are conflicting laws, the mandatory terms required by the applicable law will govern the franchise agreement to the extent of the inconsistency. This means that if a specific state or federal law has requirements that differ from the terms outlined in the Bigfoot Forestry franchise agreement, those legal requirements will take precedence.
This provision ensures that Bigfoot Forestry franchisees are protected by and must adhere to all applicable laws, even if those laws contradict the standard franchise agreement. It reflects a common practice in franchising where franchisors must comply with federal and state regulations that are designed to protect franchisees and consumers.
For a prospective Bigfoot Forestry franchisee, this clause offers some assurance that the franchise agreement will not supersede local or federal laws. However, it also places the onus on the franchisee to be aware of and comply with all relevant legal requirements in their area, which may necessitate consulting with legal counsel to ensure full compliance.