What sections of the Bft Franchise Agreement are modified by the releases outlined in this rider?
Bft Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
FOLLOW]*
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Rider to be effective as of the effective date of the Multi-Unit Agreement.
BFT FRANCHISE SPV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company [NAME OF DEVELOPER] Capacity:
RIDER TO THE BFT FRANCHISE SPV, LLC MULTI-UNIT AGREEMENT FOR USE IN MINNESOTA
| THIS RIDER (this "Rider") is made and entered into by and between | BFT FRANCHISE SPV, |
|---|---|
| LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with its principal business address at 17877 Von Karman Ave., | |
| Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 ("Franchisor"), and, | |
| whose principal business address is | ("Developer"). |
| 1. | dated |
| Background. Franchisor and Developer are parties to that certain Multi-Unit Agreement | |
| , 20 (the "Multi-Unit Agreement") that has been signed concurrently | |
| with the signing of this Rider. This Rider supersedes any inconsistent or conflicting provisions of the Multi | |
| Unit Agreement. Terms not otherwise defined in this Rider have the meanings as defined in the Multi-Unit | |
| Agreement. | |
| This Rider is annexed to and forms part of the Multi-Unit Agreement. This Rider is being | |
| signed because (a) | will be |
| the Studios that Developer will develop under the Multi-Unit Agreement | |
| developed | (b) any of the offering or sales activity relating to the Multi |
| in the State of Minnesota; and/or | |
| Unit Agreement | |
| occurred in the State of Minnesota. |
- Termination. The following sentence is added to the end of Section 8.A (Termination of Franchise by Franchisor) of the Multi-Unit Agreement:
However, with respect to franchises governed by Minnesota law, Franchisor will comply with Minnesota Statutes, Section 80C.14, Subd. 3, 4, and 5, which require (except in certain specified cases) that Developer be given 90 days' notice of termination (with 60 days to cure) of this Agreement.
- Release. The following is added to the end of Section 9.B (Transfer of Interest - By Developer and its Owners) of the Multi-Unit Agreement:
Any release required as a condition of renewal and/or assignment/transfer will not apply to the extent prohibited by the Minnesota Franchises Law.
- Governing Law. The following sentence is added to the end of Section 12.A (Governing Law) of the Multi-Unit Agreement:
Nothing in this Agreement will abrogate or reduce any of Developer's rights under the Minnesota Statutes Chapter 80C or Developer's right to any procedure, forum or remedies that the laws of the jurisdiction provide.
- Other Proceeding (Right to Injunctive Relief). The following language is added to the end of Section 12.E (Other Proceeding (Right to Injunctive Relief)) of the Multi-Unit Agreement:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a court will determine if a bond is required to obtain injunctive relief.
- Consent to Jurisdiction. The following sentence is added to the end of Section 12.F (Consent to Jurisdiction) of the Multi-Unit Agreement:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Minn. Stat. Section 80C.21 and Minn. Rule 2860.4400J prohibit Franchisor, except in certain specified cases, from requiring litigation to be conducted outside of Minnesota. Nothing in this Agreement shall abrogate or reduce any of Developer's rights under
Minnesota Statutes chapter 80C or Developer's right to any procedure, forum or remedies that the laws of the jurisdiction provide.
-
- Waiver of Punitive Damages; Jury Trial. If and then only to the extent required by the Minnesota Franchises Law, Sections 12.G (Waiver of Punitive Damages) and 12.H (Waiver of Jury Trial) of the Multi-Unit Agreement are hereby deleted.
-
- Limitation of Actions. The following is added to the end Section 12.K (Limitation of Actions) of the Multi-Unit Agreement:
; provided, however, that Minnesota law provides that no action may be commenced under Minn. Stat. Sec. 80C.17 more than 3 years after the cause of action accrues.
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Rider to be effective as of the effective date of the Multi-Unit Agreement.
BFT FRANCHISE SPV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company [NAME OF DEVELOPER] Capacity:
RIDER TO THE BFT FRANCHISE SPV, LLC MULTI-UNIT AGREEMENT FOR USE IN NEW YORK
| THIS RIDER (this "Rider") is made and entered into by and between | BFT FRANCHISE SPV, |
|---|---|
| LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with its principal business address at 17877 Von Karman Ave., | |
| Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 ("Franchisor"), and, | |
| whose principal business address is | ("Developer"). |
| 1. | dated |
| Background. Franchisor and Developer are parties to that certain Multi-Unit Agreement | |
| , 20 (the "Multi-Unit Agreement") that has been signed concurrently | |
| with the signing of this Rider. This Rider supersedes any inconsistent or conflicting provisions of the Multi | |
| Unit Agreement. |
Source: Item 17 — RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION (FDD pages 57–66)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Bft's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the sections of the Franchise Agreement modified by the releases outlined in the rider depend on the franchisee's state of residence. For franchisees residing in Maryland, the rider modifies Section 9.B (Transfer of Interest - By Developer and its Owners) of the Multi-Unit Agreement. This modification ensures that any release required as a condition of renewal and/or assignment/transfer will not apply to claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, as per COMAR 02.02.08.16L. This means Maryland franchisees retain their rights under Maryland franchise law even if a release is typically required for franchise renewal or transfer.
For franchisees residing in Minnesota, the rider modifies Sections 3.2.C (Successor Franchise) and 14.2 (Conditions for Approval of Transfer) of the Franchise Agreement. The modification specifies that any release required as a condition of renewal and/or assignment/transfer will not apply to the extent prohibited by the Minnesota Franchises Law. This protects Minnesota franchisees by ensuring that any standard release requirements do not infringe on their rights under Minnesota franchise law.
These modifications are crucial for prospective franchisees as they clarify the extent to which standard release clauses in the Franchise Agreement are enforceable, given the specific franchise laws of Maryland and Minnesota. Franchisees should consult with a legal professional to fully understand their rights and obligations under these agreements, especially concerning releases and waivers.