During an audit, is it required to exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism for Bft?
Bft Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
- Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
- Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
- Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
- Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
- Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 79–265)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Bft's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, when performing an audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS), the auditor is required to exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. This involves identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and designing and performing audit procedures responsive to those risks. These procedures include examining evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements on a test basis.
Furthermore, the auditor must obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. However, this understanding is not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control, and accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. The auditor also evaluates the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluates the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Finally, the auditor concludes whether, in their judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The auditor is also required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters identified during the audit. This ensures transparency and accountability in the audit process.