Under what conditions can a Beyond Juicery Eatery franchisee terminate the Franchise Agreement?
Beyond_Juicery_Eatery Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
[Item 23: RECEIPTS]
-
- In recognition of the requirements of the California Franchise Investment Law, Cal Corp Code §§31000-31516 and the California Franchise Relations Act, Cal Bus And Prof Code §§20000- 20043, the Franchise Agreement for BEYOND JUICERY + EATERY FRANCHISING, LLC is amended as follows:
- The California Franchise Relations Act provides you rights concerning termination or non-renewal of the Franchise Agreement, which may supersede provisions in the Franchise Agreement, specifically Sections 13 and 16.
-
- In recognition of the requirements of the Indiana Deceptive Franchise Practices Law, IC 23-2.2.7 and the Indiana Franchise Disclosure Law, IC 23-2-2-2.5, the Franchise Agreement for BEYOND JUICERY + EATERY FRANCHISING, LLC is amended as follows:
- Section 15 is amended to prohibit unlawful unilateral termination of a Franchise unless there is a material violation of the Franchise Agreement and termination is not in bad faith.
-
- In recognition of the requirements of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Washington Rev Code §§19.100.010 – 19.100.940, the Area Development Agreement for Beyond Juicery + Eatery Franchising, LLC is amended as follows:
- The Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act provides you rights concerning non-renewal and termination of the Area Development Agreement. If the Agreement contains a provision that is inconsistent with the Act, the Act shall control.
-
- In recognition of the requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, Md Code Ann, Bus Reg §§14-201-14-233, the Franchise Agreement for BEYOND JUICERY + EATERY FRANCHISING, LLC is amended as follows:
-
- In recognition of the requirements of the Hawaii Franchise Investment Law, Hawaii Revised Statutes, Title 26, Chapter 482E et. seq, the Area Development Agreement for Beyond Juicery + Eatery Franchising, LLC is amended as follows:
- The Hawaii Franchise Investment Law provides you rights concerning nonrenewal, termination and transfer of the Franchise Agreement. If the Agreement, and more specifically Sections 10 and 19 contain a provision that is inconsistent with the Hawaii Franchise Investment Law, the Hawaii Franchise Investment Law will control.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 60–337)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the conditions under which a Beyond Juicery Eatery franchisee can terminate the Franchise Agreement are subject to state-specific laws that may supersede the standard agreement. For instance, the California Franchise Relations Act and the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act grant franchisees certain rights regarding termination, potentially overriding the franchise agreement's original terms. Similarly, in Indiana, the agreement is amended to prevent unlawful unilateral termination unless there is a material violation and the termination is not in bad faith. These state laws aim to protect franchisees from unfair termination practices.
In Maryland and Hawaii, similar protections exist, ensuring that franchisees' rights concerning termination are upheld in accordance with local franchise laws. Specifically, in Hawaii, if the Area Development Agreement contains provisions inconsistent with the Hawaii Franchise Investment Law, that law will take precedence. These stipulations highlight the importance of franchisees understanding the specific legal landscape of their state, as it can significantly impact their rights and obligations under the franchise agreement.
Prospective Beyond Juicery Eatery franchisees should consult with legal counsel to fully understand how these state-specific regulations apply to their individual circumstances. This consultation will help ensure that franchisees are aware of their rights and can navigate the termination process, should the need arise, in compliance with all applicable laws. The FDD emphasizes the importance of adhering to state laws, as they can modify or even nullify certain sections of the standard franchise agreement to protect the franchisee.