In which court is the litigation involving Beyond Juicery Eatery Franchising, LLC being pursued?
Beyond_Juicery_Eatery Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Pending Action: Litigation Against Former Franchisee and Principal Owner for Collection of Past-Due Fees and Liquidated Damages and Enforcement of Post-Termination, Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure, and Covenants Not to Compete.
BEYOND JUICERY + EATERY FRANCHISING, LLC v. JP JUICE, LLC and PHILIP BATTEN, United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, Case No. 25-cv-11157, Case filed April 22, 2025. On April 22, 2025, we filed a complaint against a former franchisee to collect past-due fees and liquidated damages owed under the franchise agreement and to enforce the posttermination, confidentiality and non-disclosure, and covenants not to compete. We also filed a motion for entry of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, which is pending as of the date of this Disclosure Document. No response has currently been filed by the former franchisee or principal owner. The case remains open.
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD page 15)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Beyond Juicery Eatery's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Beyond Juicery Eatery Franchising, LLC is involved in litigation with a former franchisee and its principal owner. The case is titled BEYOND JUICERY + EATERY FRANCHISING, LLC v. JP JUICE, LLC and PHILIP BATTEN.
The legal action is taking place in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, with the case number 25-cv-11157. The complaint was officially filed on April 22, 2025. The litigation aims to recover past-due fees and liquidated damages as stipulated in the franchise agreement. Additionally, Beyond Juicery Eatery seeks to enforce post-termination obligations, including confidentiality, non-disclosure agreements, and covenants not to compete.
Beyond Juicery Eatery also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, which was pending as of the date of the FDD. As of the disclosure document's date, the former franchisee and principal owner had not yet filed a response, and the case remains open. This information is crucial for potential franchisees to understand the legal landscape and potential risks associated with Beyond Juicery Eatery.