Under what circumstances is the Rider to the Best Western Membership Agreement signed?
Best_Western Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
er term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Rider effective on the Effective Date stated in the Membership Agreement.
MEMBER: LICENSOR: [INSERT MEMBER ENTITY], a [INSERT Best Western International, Inc., an Arizona TYPE OF ENTITY] corporation Executed on: Executed on:
RIDER TO THE BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL, INC. MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR USE IN NORTH DAKOTA
This Rider (the "Rider") is made and entered into as of the Effective Date as stated in the Membership Agreement (defined below), by and between Best Western International, Inc., an Arizona nonprofit corporation with its principal business address at 6201 N. 24th Parkway, Phoenix, Arizona 85016 ("we," "us" "our," or "Licensor"), and ___________________________________ ("you," "your," or "Member").
-
- Background. Licensor and Member are parties to that certain Membership Agreement that has been signed at the same time as the signing of this Rider (the "Membership Agreement"). This Rider is annexed to and forms a part of the Membership Agreement. This Rider is being signed because (a) Member is a resident of North Dakota and the Property will be located in North Dakota, and/or (b) the offer or sale of the license for the Property that Member will operate under the Membership Agreement was made in the State of North Dakota.
-
- Releases. The following language is added as a new Section X of the Membership Agreement:
Any general release shall not apply to the extent prohibited by law with respect to claims arising under the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law.
- Liquidated Damages on Termination. The following language is added to the end of Section F.5 of the Membership Agreement:
The Commissioner has determined termination or liquidated damages to be unfair, unjust and inequitable within the intent of Section 51-19-09 of the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law. However, Best Western and Member agree to enforce these provisions to the extent the law allows.
- Governing Law/Consent to Jurisdiction. The following language is added to the end of Section Q of the Membership Agreement:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent required by the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law, North Dakota law will apply to this Agreement. In addition, to the extent required by applicable law, Member may bring an action in North Dakota.
- No Waiver of Disclaimer of Reliance. No statement, questionnaire or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or any other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Rider effective on the Effective Date stated in the Membership Agreement.
MEMBER: LICENSOR: [INSERT MEMBER ENTITY], a [INSERT Best Western International, Inc., an Arizona TYPE OF ENTITY] nonprofit corporation Executed on: Executed on:
RIDER TO THE BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL, INC. MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR USE IN RHODE ISLAND
| (in thousands) | Value | Total | (Level 1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutual funds | $ 75,070 | $ 75,070 | $ 75,070 | |
| Mortgage and asset-backed securities | 74,452 | 74,185 | 74,185 | |
| Corporate bonds | 64,357 | 63,702 | 63,702 | |
| Common shares | 44,630 | 44,630 | 44,630 | |
| U.S. treasury and government agency bonds | 32,649 | 32,538 | 32,538 | |
| Municipal and provincial notes and bonds | 3,622 | 3,594 | 3,594 | |
| Investments in certificates of deposits | 2,253 | 2,234 | 2,234 | |
| Restricted Rabbi Trust investments | 17,037 | 17,037 | 17,037 | |
| Total | $ 314,070 | $ 312,990 | $ 312,990 |
-
- Background. Licensor and Member are parties to that certain Membership Agreement that has been signed at the same time as the signing of this Rider (the "Membership Agreement"). This Rider is annexed to and forms a part of the Membership Agreement. This Rider is being signed because (a) Member is a resident of Rhode Island and the Property that Member will operate under the Membership Agreement will be located in Rhode Island; and/or (b) any of the offering or sales activity relating to the Membership Agreement occurred in Rhode Island.
-
- Governing Law/Consent to Jurisdiction. The following language is added to the end of Section Q of the Membership Agreement:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent required by applicable law, Rhode Island law will apply to claims arising under the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act. Section 19-28.1-14 of the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act provides that "A provision in a franchise agreement restricting jurisdiction or venue to a forum outside this state or requiring the application of the laws of another state is void with respect to a claim otherwise enforceable under this Act."
To the extent required by applicable law, Member may bring an action in Rhode Island for claims arising under the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act.
- No Waiver of Disclaimer of Reliance. No statement, questionnaire or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or any other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
[Signatures on following page]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Rider effective on the Effective Date stated in the Membership Agreement.
MEMBER: LICENSOR: [INSERT MEMBER ENTITY], a [INSERT Best Western International, Inc., an Arizona TYPE OF ENTITY] nonprofit corporation Executed on: Executed on:
RIDER TO THE BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL, INC. MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR USE IN WASHINGTON
This Rider (the "Rider") is made and entered into as of the Effective Date as stated in the Membership Agreement (defined below), by and between Best Western International, Inc., an Arizona nonprofit corporation with its principal business address at 6201 N. 24th Parkway, Phoenix, Arizona 85016 ("we," "us" "our," or "Licensor"), and ___________________________________ ("you," "your," or "Member").
-
- Background. Licensor and Member are parties to those certain regulatory documents, including, (i) the Membership Agreement; (ii) Bylaws; and (iii) Rules and Regulations; that have been signed at the same time as the signing of this Rider (collectively, the "Regulatory Documents"). This Rider is annexed to and forms part of the Regulatory Documents. This Rider is being signed because (a) the Property that Member will operate under the Membership Agreement will be located in Washington; and/or (b) Member is a resident of Washington; and/or (c) any of the offering or sales activity relating to the Membership Agreement occurred in Washington.
-
- Addition of Paragraphs. The following is added to the end of all the Regulatory Documents:
In recognition of the requirements by the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Act"), the Regulatory Documents of Best Western International, Inc. shall be modified as follows:
In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede this Agreement in Member's relationship with Best Western including the areas of termination and renewal of your license. There may also be court decisions which may supersede this Agreement in Member's relationship with Best Western including the areas of termination and renewal of Member's license.
In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation, or as determined by the arbitrator or mediator at the time of arbitration or mediation. In addition, if litigation is not precluded by the Agreement, a Member may bring an action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the sale of licenses, or a violation of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, in Washington.
A release or waiver of rights executed by a franchisee may not include rights under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act or any rule or order thereunder except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement after the
Agreement is in effect and where the parties are represented by independent counsel. Provisions such as those which unreasonably restrict or limit the statute of limitations period for claims under the Act, or rights or remedies under the Act such as a right to a jury trial, may not be enforceable.
Transfer fees are collectable to the extent that they reflect the franchisor's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer.
Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an employee, including an employee of a franchisee, unless the employee's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $100,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation). In addition, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an independent contractor of a franchisee under RCW 49.62.030 unless the independent contractor's earnings from the party seeking enforcement, when annualized, exceed $250,000 per year (an amount that will be adjusted annually for inflation). As a result, any provisions contained in the franchise agreement or elsewhere that conflict with these limitations are void and unenforceable in Washington.
RCW 49.62.060 prohibits a franchisor from restricting, restraining, or prohibiting a franchisee from (i) soliciting or hiring any employee of a franchisee of the same franchisor or (ii) soliciting or hiring any employee of the franchisor. As a result, any such provisions contained in the franchise agreement or elsewhere are void and unenforceable in Washington.
- No Waiver of Disclaimer of Reliance. No statement, questionnaire or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or any other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Rider effective on the Effective Date stated in the Regulatory Documents.
Source: Item 23 — Receipts (FDD pages 108–413)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Best Western FDD, a rider to the Best Western Membership Agreement is signed concurrently with the Membership Agreement. These riders modify the Membership Agreement to comply with specific state laws. The need for a rider is triggered by factors such as the location of the property, the member's residency, or where the franchise offer or sale occurred. These riders are designed to ensure that Best Western's franchise operations adhere to the franchise laws of specific states.
For example, if a Best Western property is located in Minnesota, a rider is added to the Membership Agreement to ensure compliance with Minnesota franchise law, addressing issues like termination notice, governing law, and limitations of claims. Similarly, a rider is required in states like North Dakota, New York, Washington, Illinois, Maryland, California, Hawaii, Indiana, Michigan, South Dakota, Virginia, and Wisconsin, each addressing specific legal requirements within those states.
These riders modify specific sections of the Membership Agreement. For instance, the North Dakota rider addresses releases and liquidated damages on termination, while the Minnesota rider covers infringement, termination, governing law, and limitations of claims. The Illinois rider focuses on governing law, consent to jurisdiction, and limitation of claims. The Washington rider includes modifications to all regulatory documents, including the Membership Agreement, Bylaws, and Rules and Regulations.
For a prospective Best Western franchisee, this means that the specific terms of their Membership Agreement may vary depending on the state in which they operate. It is crucial to carefully review the rider applicable to their state to understand any modifications to the standard agreement. Franchisees should pay close attention to provisions related to termination, dispute resolution, and compliance with local laws to ensure they are fully aware of their rights and obligations.