factual

Can a Belocal franchisee in Minnesota be required to consent to a claims period that differs from the statute of limitations under Minnesota law?

Belocal Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

Any provision that requires Franchisee to consent to a claims period that differs from the applicable statute of limitations period under Minn.

Stat § 80C.17, Subd. 5. may not be enforceable under Minnesota law.

Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD page 71)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Belocal's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, any provision in the franchise agreement that requires a franchisee in Minnesota to consent to a claims period that differs from the statute of limitations period under Minnesota law may not be enforceable. This is to protect the franchisee's rights under Minnesota law.

This means that Belocal cannot force a Minnesota franchisee to agree to a shorter or different time frame for bringing legal claims than what is allowed by Minnesota statutes. The applicable statute is Minn. Stat § 80C.17, Subd. 5.

This provision ensures that Minnesota franchisees retain their full legal rights and protections under state law, preventing Belocal from imposing contractual terms that could unfairly limit their ability to pursue legal remedies. Prospective franchisees should consult with an attorney to fully understand their rights and the implications of this clause.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.