What is the name of the lawsuit in which Ryan Junk, CEO of Beem Light Sauna, is named as a defendant?

ffs' franchise agreement was terminated.

Pending Actions Involving Individuals Listed in Item 2

Ryan Junk, our Chief Executive Officer, previously served as Chief Operating Officer of Xponential and various subsidiaries of Xponential, and Anthony Geisler, the Chief Executive Officer of Sequel Brands, previously served in the same role for Xponential and various subsidiaries of Xponential. They have been named as defendants, along with other officers and employees of Xponential, in the following lawsuits involving Xponential and its affiliates, which involve similar claims and allegations. We are not affiliated with Xponential and these lawsuits do not involve us or our affiliates.

• Dance Fitness Michigan LLC, et al. v. AKT Franchise, LLC, et al., filed August 30, 2023, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2023-01345433- CU-AT-CXC (the "AKT Lawsuit"). This action was filed by certain former AKT® franchisees and their owners, including Dance Fitness Michigan LLC, Property Maintenance, Inc., 6pk Mason LLC, 6pk Liberty LLC, Teeny Turner LLC, S2 Fitness Enterprises, LLC, Soros & Associates, LLC, AdEdge Services Inc., Deanna Alfredo, Amanda Davis, Nisha Moeller, Samantha Cox, Suzanne Fischer, Nichole Soros, Michael Soros, Paul Dumas, Jodi Dumas and Laura Hannan (collectively, the "AKT Plaintiffs") against (i) AKT Franchise, LLC and AKT Franchise SPV, LLC; (ii) Xponential, Xponential Fitness, Inc., XPOF Assetco, LLC, and Xponential Intermediate Holdings, LLC (collectively, the "Xponential Entities"); (iii) H&W Franchise Intermediate Holdings LLC, H&W Investco LP, and H&W Investco II LP (collectively, the "H&W Entities"); (iv) LAG Fit, Inc.; (v) MGAG LLC; and (vi) Anthony Geisler, Mark Grabowski, Melissa Chordock, Elizabeth "Liz" Batterton Cooper, Alexander Cordova, Lance Freeman, Ryan Junk, Megan Moen, John Meloun, Sarah Luna, Tori Johnston, Justin LaCava, Bobby Tetsch, Brandon Wiles, Jason Losco, Brittney Holobinko, Amy Wehrkamp, Scott Svilich, Sarah Nolan, Emily Brown, Rachel Markovic, and Brenda Morris (collectively, (i) through (vi), the "AKT Defendants") after AKT Franchise, LLC initiated an arbitration against and sought damages from certain of them for breaches of their franchise agreements. The AKT Plaintiffs alleged that one or more of the AKT Defendants (a) violated pre-sale disclosure obligations under the California Franchise Investment Law, the Florida Franchise Act, and the Michigan Franchise Investment Law by failing to provide a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document, making statements that they contend were erroneous or prohibited, and failing to disclose information that they contend necessitated disclosure; (b) fraudulently induced them to invest in franchises; (c) breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (d) breached a purported agreement to provide certain financing; and (e) engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices. The AKT Plaintiffs seek (1) declaratory and injunctive relief regarding the enforcement of the mandatory arbitration provisions in their franchise agreements; (2) rescission of their franchise agreements; (3) actual and special damages; and (4) attorneys' fees, costs, and interest. The AKT Defendants have all filed a demurrer to the complaint.
• Enlightened Armadillo, Inc., et al. v. Yoga Six Franchise, LLC, et al., filed November 22, 2023, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2023- 01367265-CU-AT-CXC. This action was filed by two Yoga Six® franchisees and their owners, including Enlightened Armadillo, Inc., Snug Holding Company LLC, Mark Hrubant, Ella Hrubant, and Melinda Sung (collectively, the "Y6 Plaintiffs") against (i) Yoga Six Franchise, LLC ("Y6") and Yoga Six Franchise SPV, LLC; (ii) the Xponential Entities; (iii) the H&W Entities; (iv) LAG Fit, Inc.; (v) MGAG LLC;

Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 13–18)