What case number was assigned to the Mary Martinez complaint against Beehive Homes?
Beehive_Homes Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
On September 21, 2023, Mary Martinez, as Attorney-in-Fact of Martha Viola Jones, filed a Complaint (Case No. D-101-CV-2023-02336) in the First Judicial District Court for the County of Santa Fe, State of New Mexico, against San Pedro Hope, LLC dba Bee Hive Homes of Santa Fe; Buzz Operations, LLC; Bee Hive Homes of America, Inc,., and Danyell Sena, in her capacity as the Administrator of Bee Hive Homes of Santa Fe alleging negligence, unfair trade practices and punitive damages. Bee Hive Homes of America, Inc. has denied any liability in the matter. The Court has granted its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, with prejudice.
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 10–11)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Beehive Homes' 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a complaint was filed on September 21, 2023, by Mary Martinez, as Attorney-in-Fact of Martha Viola Jones, against San Pedro Hope, LLC dba Bee Hive Homes of Santa Fe, Buzz Operations, LLC, Bee Hive Homes of America, Inc., and Danyell Sena. The case number assigned to this complaint in the First Judicial District Court for the County of Santa Fe, State of New Mexico, is D-101-CV-2023-02336. The complaint alleges negligence, unfair trade practices, and punitive damages. Bee Hive Homes of America, Inc. has denied any liability in the matter, and the Court has granted its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, with prejudice.
This information is relevant for prospective franchisees as it provides insight into the types of legal challenges Beehive Homes has faced. While the specific case mentioned was dismissed against Bee Hive Homes of America, Inc. due to lack of personal jurisdiction, it highlights the potential for franchisees to be involved in legal disputes related to negligence or unfair trade practices. Understanding the nature and outcomes of such litigation can help franchisees assess the risks associated with investing in a Beehive Homes franchise.
It is important to note that the FDD only discloses litigation that is required to be disclosed under Item 3. Franchisees should consider consulting with legal counsel to fully understand their potential liabilities and obligations. Additionally, prospective franchisees may want to inquire with Beehive Homes about any other pending or resolved litigation not disclosed in the FDD to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the company's legal history.