factual

Does the Bee Organized franchise agreement include limitations of claims?

Bee_Organized Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

ng reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this Illinois amendment to Bee Organized Enterprises, LLC Franchise Agreement on the same date as the Franchise Agreement was executed.

Franchisor: Bee Organized Enterprises, LLC Franchisee:
By: Signature
Signature
Name and Title (please print) Name (please print)
Dated Dated

MARYLAND FRANCHISE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

Amendments to the Bee Organized Franchise Agreement:

In recognition of the requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, the parties to the attached Bee Organized Enterprises, LLC Franchise Agreement (the "Franchise Agreement"), as follows:

    1. The franchise agreement provides that disputes are resolved through arbitration. A Maryland franchise regulation states that it is an unfair or deceptive practice to require a franchisee to waive its right to file a lawsuit in Maryland claiming a violation of the Maryland Franchise Law. In light of the Federal Arbitration Act, there is some dispute as to whether this forum selection requirement is legally enforceable.
    1. The general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, and/or assignment/transfer shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
    1. Article 18.G. of the Franchise Agreement, under the heading "Choice of Law, Non-Binding Mediation, Binding Arbitration, and Consent to Jurisdiction," shall be amended by the addition of the following statement added to Article 18.G. of the Franchise Agreement:
    • A franchisee may bring a lawsuit in Maryland for claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
    1. Article 18.I. of the Franchise Agreement, under the heading "Limitations of Claims," shall be amended by the addition of the following statement added to Article 18.I. of the Franchise Agreement:

Any claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law must be brought within three years after the grant of the franchise.

A general release required as a condition of renewal, sale and/or assignment or transfer of a Franchise Agreement shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law

    1. All representations requiring prospective franchisees to assent to a release, estoppel or waiver of liability are not intended to nor shall they act as a release, estoppel or waiver of any liability incurred under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
    1. Each provision of this amendment shall be effective only to the extent, with respect to such provision, that the jurisdictional requirements of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law are met independently without reference to this amendment.
    1. No statement, questionnaire or acknowledgement signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of: (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this Maryland amendment to the Bee Organized Enterprises, LLC Franchise Agreement on the same date as the Franchise Agreement was executed.

Franchisor: Bee Organized Enterprises, LLC Franchisee:
By: Signature
Signature
Name and Title (please print)

Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 54–218)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to the 2025 Bee Organized Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement does include limitations of claims, with some state-specific amendments.

Specifically, for franchisees in Maryland, any claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law must be brought within three years after the grant of the franchise. Additionally, a general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, and/or assignment or transfer of a Franchise Agreement shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.

For franchisees in North Dakota, provisions requiring the franchisee to consent to a limitation of claims within one year have been determined to be unfair, unjust, and inequitable under North Dakota law. Therefore, for North Dakota franchisees, the statute of limitations under North Dakota Law will apply. Furthermore, no statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgement signed by a franchisee can waive claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on any statement made by Bee Organized.

For franchisees in New York, nothing in the agreement should be considered a waiver of any right conferred upon franchisee by New York General Business Law, Sections 680-695. Also, no statement, questionnaire or acknowledgement signed by a franchisee can waive any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on any statement made by Bee Organized. These limitations and amendments are important for prospective franchisees to understand, as they define the timeframe and conditions under which they can bring legal claims against Bee Organized, with specific variations based on the state in which the franchise operates.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.