Why did Batteries Plus Bulbs file the case against David Hennessey?
Batteries_Plus_Bulbs Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Franchisor-Initiated Litigation Against Franchisees in the Last Fiscal Year:
Batteries Plus L.L.C. v Hennessey, David. State of Connecticut Superior Court, HHD-CV-24-6189067S (filed August 2, 2024). Batteries Plus filed this case against a former franchisee for amounts owed to Batteries Plus.
Other than as described above, no litigation is required to be disclosed in this Item.
Source: Item 3 — Litigation (FDD pages 15–16)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Batteries Plus Bulbs's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, Batteries Plus L.L.C. initiated litigation against David Hennessey, a former franchisee, on August 2, 2024. The legal action, filed in the State of Connecticut Superior Court, HHD-CV-24-6189067S, was for the recovery of amounts owed to Batteries Plus Bulbs.
This type of legal action is not uncommon in franchising. Franchisors often pursue former franchisees for outstanding debts, which may include unpaid franchise fees, royalties, or other contractual obligations. For a prospective franchisee, this highlights the importance of understanding the financial obligations outlined in the franchise agreement and the potential consequences of failing to meet them.
It is important to note that the FDD only provides a brief description of the case. A prospective Batteries Plus Bulbs franchisee should consider asking the franchisor for more details about the nature of the debt and the current status of the litigation to fully understand the potential financial risks involved in operating a franchise.