What laws govern the Basecamp Fitness agreement and franchise relationship?
Basecamp_Fitness Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
r her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party. | | You expressly waive the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code and expressly release each party | | to be released from all liability or claims arising out of any matters recited in the release.] | | | | | | DATE: |
CALIFORNIA ADDENDUM TO FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Basecamp Fitness Franchisor LLC Franchise Agreement, the following provisions shall supersede and apply to all Basecamp Fitness franchises offered and sold in the state of California:
This California Addendum is only applicable if you are a resident of California or if your business is located in California.
-
- The California Franchise Relations Act (Business and Professions Code Section 20000 through 20043), provides franchisees with additional rights concerning termination and non-renewal of the Franchise Agreement and certain provisions of the Franchise Agreement relating to termination and nonrenewal may be superseded by the Act. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the Franchise Agreement and your relationship with Franchisor, including the areas of termination and renewal of Franchisee's franchise. If the Franchise Agreement is inconsistent with the law, the law will control.
-
- The Franchise Agreement requires Franchisee to execute a general release of claims upon renewal or transfer of the Franchise Agreement. California Corporations Code Section 31512 provides that any condition, stipulation or provision purporting to bind any person acquiring any franchise to waive compliance with any provision of that law or any rule or order thereunder is void. Section 31512 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Investment Law (California Corporations Code Section 20010 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Relations Act (Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 - 20043)). To the extent required by such laws, Franchisee shall not be required to execute a general release.
-
- The Franchise Agreement requires application of the laws and forum of Minnesota. This provision may not be enforceable under California law.
-
- The Franchise Agreement contains a covenant not to compete which extends beyond the termination of the franchise. This provision may not be enforceable under California law.
-
- The provision in the Franchise Agreement which terminates the franchise upon the bankruptcy of the Franchisee may not be enforceable under Title 11, United States Code, Section 101.
-
- The Franchise Agreement contains a waiver of punitive damages and jury trial provision. These waivers may not be enforceable under California law.
-
- The Franchise Agreement requires binding arbitration. The arbitration will occur at the office of the American Arbitration Association in Minneapolis, Minnesota. You will bear all costs of arbitration if we secure any relief against you in the arbitration, or are successful in defending a claim you bring against us in the arbitration. Prospective franchisees are encouraged to consult private legal counsel to determine the applicability of California and federal laws (such as Business and Professions Code section 20040.5, Code of Civil Procedure section 1281, and the Federal Arbitration Act) to any provisions of a franchise agreement restricting venue to a forum outside the State of California.
-
- Sections 22 (a) and (b) of the Agreement are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
"[Intentionally Deleted]"
- No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by Franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any
claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by the Franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the Franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
below.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD pages 61–62)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Basecamp Fitness Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement and relationship are governed by specific state laws, which may supersede certain provisions of the standard franchise agreement. For franchisees in California, the California Franchise Relations Act (Business and Professions Code Section 20000 through 20043) provides additional rights concerning termination and non-renewal. Additionally, California Corporations Code Section 31512 voids any waiver of rights under the Franchise Investment Law and the Franchise Relations Act. Certain provisions in the franchise agreement, such as those requiring the application of Minnesota laws and forum, covenants not to compete extending beyond the franchise term, termination upon bankruptcy, and waivers of punitive damages and jury trials, may not be enforceable under California law.
For Basecamp Fitness franchisees in Illinois, Illinois law governs the Franchise Agreement. The Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act outlines franchisee rights upon termination and non-renewal. Section 4 of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act voids any provision designating jurisdiction and venue outside of Illinois, although arbitration may occur outside the state. Furthermore, Section 41 of the Act voids any waiver of compliance with the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act or any other Illinois law.
For franchisees in Washington, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW, takes precedence in the event of conflicting laws. RCW 19.100.180, known as the Franchisee Bill of Rights, may also supersede provisions in the franchise agreement, particularly concerning termination and renewal. In Minnesota, Basecamp Fitness cannot require franchisees to release liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 80C.01 to 80C.22, although voluntary dispute settlements are permitted. Finally, for franchisees in Virginia, no statement can waive claims under state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on statements made by Basecamp Fitness.