Does the Basecamp Fitness franchise agreement supersede any other document terms regarding waivers of claims or disclaimers of reliance related to the franchise relationship?

ions of Item 17(v), titled "Choice of forum", and Item 17(w), titled "Choice of law":

The foregoing choice of law should not be considered a waiver of any right conferred upon the franchisor or upon the franchisee by Article 33 of the General Business Law of the State of New York.

• 1. Franchise Questionnaires and Acknowledgements No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
• 1. Receipts Any sale made must be in compliance with § 683(8) of the Franchise Sale Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 680 et seq.), which describes the time period a Franchise Disclosure Document (offering prospectus) must be provided to a prospective franchisee before a sale may be made. New York law requires a franchisor to provide the Franchise Disclosure Document at the earlier of the first personal meeting, ten (10) business days before the execution of the franchise or other agreement, or the payment of any consideration that relates to the franchise relationship.

STATE SPECIFIC ADDENDUM AS REQUIRED BY THE NORTH DAKOTA FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Basecamp Fitness Franchisor LLC Franchise Disclosure Document, the following provisions shall supersede any inconsistent provisions and apply to all Basecamp Fitness franchises offered and sold in the state of North Dakota:

This North Dakota Addendum is only applicable if you are a resident of North Dakota or if your business will be located in North Dakota.

• 1. The North Dakota Securities Commissioner has determined that it is unfair and unequitable under the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law for the franchisor to require the franchisee to sign a general release upon renewal of the Franchise Agreement. Therefore, the requirement that the franchisee signs a release upon renewal of the Franchise Agreement is deleted from Item 17c. and from any other place it appears in the Disclosure Document or in the Franchise Agreement.
• 1. Item 17r. is revised to provide that covenants not to compete, such as those mentioned in Item 17r. of the Disclosure Document, are generally considered unenforceable in the state of North Dakota.
• 1. The North Dakota Securities Commissioner has determined that it is unfair and unequitable under the North Dakota Franchise Investment Law for the franchisor to require the franchisee to consent to the jurisdiction of courts located outside of North Dakota. Therefore, any references in the Disclosure Document and in the Franchise Agreement are deleted and to any requirement that the franchisee consents to the jurisdiction of courts located outside of North Dakota are deleted.
• 1. Any references in the Disclosure Document and in the Franchise Agreement and to any requirement to consent to a waiver of exemplary and punitive damages are deleted.
• 1. Any references in the Disclosure Document and in the Franchise Agreement and to any requirement to consent to a waiver of trial by jury are deleted.
• 1. Any claims arising under the North Dakota franchise law will be governed by the laws of the State of North Dakota.
• 1. The prevailing party in any enforcement action is entitled to recover all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees.
• 1. Any references in the Disclosure Document and in the Franchise Agreement requiring franchisee to consent to termination penalties or liquidated damages are deleted.

Source: Item 17 — RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER, AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION (FDD pages 51–55)