In the event of a conflict of laws, which law prevails for a Basecamp Fitness franchise?
Basecamp_Fitness Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
The provisions of this Addendum form an integral part of, are incorporated into, and modify the Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchise agreement, and all related agreements regardless of anything to the contrary contained therein. This Addendum applies if: (a) the offer to sell a franchise is accepted in Washington; (b) the purchaser of the franchise is a resident of Washington; and/or (c) the franchised business that is the subject of the sale is to be located or operated, wholly or partly, in Washington.
-
- Conflict of Laws. In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
Source: Item 22 — CONTRACTS (FDD pages 61–62)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Basecamp Fitness's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Washington Addendum to the Franchise Agreement addresses conflict of laws. For Basecamp Fitness franchises in Washington, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW, will prevail in the event of a conflict of laws.
This means that if there is a disagreement between what the franchise agreement says and what the Washington state law says, the state law will be followed. This protection is specifically for franchisees operating in Washington, ensuring that the state's franchise laws take precedence over conflicting terms in the franchise agreement.
Prospective Basecamp Fitness franchisees should be aware of any addenda that apply to their specific state, as these can modify the standard franchise agreement. This ensures that franchisees' rights are protected under local laws, especially concerning aspects like termination, renewal, and dispute resolution.