Is Carl Diehl associated with the Basecamp Fitness brand, and if so, in what capacity regarding the litigation?
Basecamp_Fitness Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
or did not accept the offer of rescission and its agreement continues in effect.
In the Matter of the Investigation by Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York, of The Bar Method Inc. and Carl Diehl (Assurance No. 08-108). On April 2, 2009, TBM and Mr. Diehl, as its Vice President, entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") under which, without admitting any violation of the law, they agreed to offer rescission of an agreement that TBM signed in New York without being registered to sell franchises in that state. As part of the AOD, TBM and Mr. Diehl agreed to comply with the provisions of the New York Franchises Act and not to sell franchises in New York without a current registration. TBM also paid to the State of New York the sum of $2,500. The New York operator did not accept th
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 13–14)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Basecamp Fitness Franchise Disclosure Document, Carl Diehl is not directly associated with any litigation concerning the Basecamp Fitness brand itself. However, he is mentioned in connection with litigation involving The Bar Method Inc., an affiliate of Basecamp Fitness.
Specifically, Carl Diehl, in his capacity as Vice President of The Bar Method Inc., entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance (AOD) with the Attorney General of the State of New York on April 2, 2009. This AOD addressed issues related to selling franchises in New York without proper registration. While neither admitting any violation of the law, Diehl and The Bar Method Inc. agreed to offer rescission to a New York operator and to comply with the New York Franchises Act, including registering before selling franchises in the state. The Bar Method Inc. also paid $2,500 to the State of New York. The New York operator declined the offer of rescission and continued to operate under the original agreement.
This information is relevant to prospective Basecamp Fitness franchisees as it provides insight into the legal history and compliance practices of an affiliated company and its leadership. While the litigation does not directly involve Basecamp Fitness, it demonstrates the importance of franchise law compliance and the potential consequences of non-compliance, such as fines and the requirement to offer rescission to franchisees.