What is the geographic scope of the amendment regarding litigation requirements for Bang Cookies?
Bang_Cookies Franchise · 2024 FDDAnswer from 2024 FDD Document
re Law or the Indiana Deceptive Franchise Practices Act.
Maryland FDD Amendment
Amendments to the Bang Cookies Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 17, "Renewal, Termination, Transfer and Dispute Resolution," is supplemented, by the addition of the following:
- A. The general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, and/or assignment/transfer shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
- B. A Franchisee may bring a lawsuit in Maryland for claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
- C. Any claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law must be brought within three years after the grant of the franchise.
- D. The Franchise Agreement provides for termination upon bankruptcy. This provision may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C. Section 101, et seq.).
Michigan FDD Amendment
Amendments to the Bang Cookies Franchise Disclosure Document
-
- THE STATE OF MICHIGAN PROHIBITS CERTAIN UNFAIR PROVISIONS THAT ARE SOMETIMES IN FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS ARE IN THESE FRANCHISE DOCUMENTS, THE PROVISIONS ARE VOID AND CANNOT BE ENFORCED AGAINST YOU.
- A. A prohibition of your right to join an association of Franchisees.
- B. A requirement that you assent to a release, assignment, novation, waiver or estoppel that deprives you of rights and protections provided in this act. This shall not preclude you, after entering into a Franchise Agreement, from settling any and all claims.
- C. A provision that permits us to terminate a franchise before the expiration of this term except for good cause. Good cause shall include your failure to comply with any lawful provision of the Franchise Agreement and to cure the failure after being given written notice of the failure and a reasonable opportunity, which in no event need be more than 30 days, to cure the failure.
- D. A provision that permits us to refuse to renew a franchise without fairly compensating you by repurchase or other means for the fair market value at the time of expiration of your inventory, supplies, equipment, fixtures and furnishings. Personalized materials that have no value to us and inventory, supplies, equipment, fixtures and furnishings not reasonably required in the conduct of the franchise business are not subject to compensation. This subsection applies only if: (a) the term of the franchise is less than five years, and (b) you are prohibited by the Franchise Agreement or other agreement from continuing to conduct substantially the same business under another trademark, service mark, trade name, logotype, advertising or other commercial symbol in the same area subsequent to the expiration of the franchise or you do not receive at least six months advance notice of our intent not to renew the franchise.
- E. A provision that permits us to refuse to renew a franchise on terms generally available to other Franchisees of the same class or type under similar circumstances. This section does not require a renewal provision.
- F. A provision requiring that litigation be conducted outside this state. This shall not preclude you from entering into an agreement, at the time of litigation, to conduct litigation at a location outside this state.
- G. A provision that permits us to refuse to permit a transfer of ownership of a franchise, except for good cause. The subdivision does not prevent us from exercising a right of first refusal to purchase the franchise. Good cause shall include, but is not limited to:
- (i) The failure of the proposed transferee to meet our then current reasonable qualifications or standards.
- (ii) The fact that the proposed transferee is our or Sub-franchisor's competitor.
- (iii) The unwillingness of the proposed transferee to agree in writing to comply with all lawful obligations.
- (iv) Your or proposed transferee's failure to pay us any sums or to cure any default in the Franchise Agreement existing at the time of the proposed transfer.
- H. A provision that requires you to resell to us items that are not uniquely identified with us. This subdivision does not prohibit a provision that grants us a right of first refusal to purchase the assets of a franchise on the same terms and conditions as a bona fide third party willing and able to purchase those assets, nor does this subdivision prohibit a provision that grants us the right to acquire the assets of a franchise for the market or appraised value and has failed to cure the breach in the manner provided in Item 17(g).
- I. A provision that permits us to directly or indirectly convey, assign or otherwise transfer our obligations to fulfill contractual obligations to you unless a provision has been made for providing the required contractual services.
-
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 56–245)
What This Means (2024 FDD)
According to Bang Cookies' 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document, several amendments address litigation requirements, each specific to certain states. For Michigan, the amendment explicitly states that any provision requiring litigation to be conducted outside of Michigan is void and unenforceable against the franchisee. However, it does not prevent a franchisee from agreeing to conduct litigation outside the state at the time of the litigation. For North Dakota, the addendum applies only if the franchisee is a resident of North Dakota or if their Bang Cookies shop will be located within the state. The amendment specifies that provisions requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to the jurisdiction of courts outside of North Dakota may not be enforceable in North Dakota.
These state-specific amendments reflect the franchise laws in Michigan and North Dakota, which aim to protect franchisees from unfair or overly burdensome litigation terms imposed by the franchisor. The Michigan amendment ensures that franchisees are not forced to litigate disputes in a distant or inconvenient forum, while the North Dakota amendment reinforces similar protections and ensures the application of North Dakota law.
For a prospective Bang Cookies franchisee, these amendments provide important legal safeguards. Franchisees in Michigan can be confident that they cannot be compelled to litigate outside of their state unless they specifically agree to it at the time of the dispute. Similarly, franchisees in North Dakota are assured that local laws and regulations will govern litigation matters, and they cannot be forced to waive their rights to a jury trial or certain damages. These provisions help to level the playing field between the franchisor and franchisee, ensuring a fairer dispute resolution process.
It is important for potential franchisees to carefully review these state-specific amendments and understand their rights under the franchise agreement. Franchisees should also consult with an attorney to fully understand the implications of these provisions and how they may affect their specific circumstances. Understanding these legal protections can help franchisees make informed decisions and protect their interests throughout the duration of the franchise agreement.